robertosfield wrote: > > > > And maybe this time we will get header files with the .h extension. ;) > > > > Maybe, no decisions made yet, but I'm also not polling for opinions, > the VulkanSceneGraph isn't a design by committee. > > My initial code experiments have .hpp but frankly it's ugly as hell as > well as stupid - there's no header plus plus language so I'm rapidly > tiring of .hpp. Code should to be a thing of beauty not some ugly > kludge. .h makes sense as it's a header, .cpp makes sense for source > files as it's C++.
The ISO cpp guidelines recommend using .h for headers and .cpp for source: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rs-file-suffix robertosfield wrote: > However, public headers are placed into include > directories and that's their role, we know they are headers because > that's why we put them there, so the .h should be superfluous for > public headers and the standard C++ headers illustrate this. If 3rd > party tools/editors can't even handle the extension less C++ standard > library headers then they aren't really up to the job. > As a Visual Studio user I do disagree (since Visual Studio really seems to dislike extensionless headers). But I also recognize that the decision is your prerogative to make as creator. Regards, Björn ------------------ Read this topic online here: http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=73993#73993 _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
