Hi Mark,
On 11/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert,
This thread is in response to your request for solutions to the present
problem and in particular you offered choices. Paul gave reasons why
your choice #4 seemed best. I agree with Paul's rationale.
That is my constructive feedback in a nutshell.
If you don't like your choice #4 as a solution (long or short term),
that's fine by me. I hope the feedback has been helpful to you.
choice #4 is a via long term solution, but not a short term one.
The downside of choice #4, while technically ok, forces OSG users into
having an ever greater number of packages to deal with. It would
stand like:
OpenThreads
OpenSceneGraph
DWMake
Producer
osgProducer
And potentially
CMake or similiar build system.
Now it was unweildy enough just having the triple set. The above set
would be a tangled nightmare to manage for me as a project lead, as
for end users forced to jump through all the different hoops.
Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
