Hi Andy, One thing that looked suspicious about the OOTB CMake x64 build was that it was explicitly specifying the /MACHINE:I386 option to the linker -- which is wrong -- but it still worked because the /machine:x64 option was explicitly specified after it and overrode it. It looks like your link line is missing the /machine:x64 option for some reason. If you can figure out how to get that back it'll likely fix your problem.
-Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:osg-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Skinner > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:30 PM > To: osg users > Subject: RE: [osg-users] building on windows 64 > > I'm still able to build x64 with OSG on its own (out of the box). I > currently think that it is something about our environment, because it > fails when I build it as part of a makefile using our flags, etc, all > handled down through CMake variables. > > I've got BuildLog.htm files for the out-of-the-box build that works and > the in-our-own-box build that doesn't. If you know enough about Windows > command lines to help me pick out where it is I'm messing up, I'll send > them. (I attached the BuildLog.htm for the build that didn't work in > the previous message, but I also have a BuildLog.htm file for a similar > build that worked.) > > I'm expecting it is something I've inherited from our build commands. > > thanks > andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wittman > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 3:03 PM > To: osg users > Subject: RE: [osg-users] building on windows 64 > > Hi Andy, > > I believe you're correct in your analysis, but I don't know why you're > seeing that architecture inconsistency. For me OSG 2.0 builds without > error for both x86 and x64 when I run both CMake and the build on 64 bit > Windows, and it didn't require any special configuration beyond > selecting the appropriate architecture in CMake. I build the INSTALL > target from the command line with devenv.com. > > Did you by any chance open the dsw or dsp in the win32 directory and > cause the CMake-generated vcproj file to be overwritten? > > You may want to give the out-of-source build a try and see if that makes > a difference. > > -Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:osg-users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Skinner > > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 8:22 AM > > To: osg users > > Subject: RE: [osg-users] building on windows 64 > > > > I mean that I wonder whether the arguments going to the compilation of > > OpenThreads C++ files are built for one architecture (64 bits) and the > > link of the OpenThreads library for another (32). I'm guessing, to be > > honest, but it is my attempt at explaining the error: > > ---- > > .\openthreads.dir\release\WIN32Condition.obj : fatal error LNK1112: > > module machine type 'x64' conflicts with target machine type 'X86' > > ---- > > during the link. > > > > > > Did my attachment come through, showing all the arguments? If someone > > windows-friendly could take a look at it, I'd appreciate it. > > > > I've built on win64 in the past. I ran cmake on my 32-bit box, then > > built in visual studio on the win64 box. This time, I've got it > hooked > > into our build system, and I'm running cmake and the actual build (not > > from visual studio) on win64. I think it is probably something I can > > configure, but think I need input from someone with more windows _and_ > > building OSG experience than I have. > > > > thanks > > andy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert > > Osfield > > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 9:08 AM > > To: osg users > > Subject: Re: [osg-users] building on windows 64 > > > > On 7/13/07, Andy Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, my OpenThreads is inside OpenSceneGraph/src. > > > > > > Could someone explain to me the win32 subdirectory in OpenThreads? > Is > > > that supposed to work with Windows 64? > > > > Yes. Many win32 API's are still applicable to 64 bit build. > > > > Others have reported success on building the OSG on 64 windows so I > > don't believe there is any major issue. > > > > > Maybe my problem is just that the compile is using one machine > > > architecture, and the link is using another. > > > > When you say link, you mean you app that links to the OSG is built on > > a machine with another architecture? > > > > Robert. > > _______________________________________________ > > osg-users mailing list > > osg-users@openscenegraph.net > > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > > osg-users mailing list > > osg-users@openscenegraph.net > > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ > > Mike Wittman > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___________________________________________________ > Seismic Micro-Technology, Inc. > 8584 Katy Freeway, Suite 400 / Houston, Texas 77024 > Tel. +1 (713) 464-6188 > Fax. +1 (713) 464-6440 > Web: www.seismicmicro.com > ___________________________________________________ > Seismic through Simulation with KINGDOM, (RC)2, and SURE! - CONTACT US > TODAY for more information. > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@openscenegraph.net > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@openscenegraph.net > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@openscenegraph.net http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
