Thanks Guillaume, that sounds great! We're already running on Karaf so that's a good match. Fabric8 looks ... big. I don't find the DOSGi stuff in the docs but see mentions of CXF and ActiveMQ. Do you know your way around Fabric8 so you could point me at the Remote Service stuff? Thanks Mike
_____ From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: den 28 februari 2014 17:07 To: [email protected]; OSGi Developer Mail List Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] remote services distribution providerrecommendations? The Fabric8 DOSGi implementation indeed support referential integrity. Guillaume Nodet 2014-02-28 16:31 GMT+01:00 Mike Wilson <[email protected]>: Thanks David, yes I've seen this list. Does any of these implementations support the referential integrity within transferred data I am seeking? And are all mature and being maintained? Best regards Mike David Bosschaert wrote: > Sent: den 28 februari 2014 10:41 > To: OSGi Developer Mail List > Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] remote services distribution > providerrecommendations? > > There is a Wikipedia page that lists all known OSGi spec > implementations, including the Remote Service implementations. You'll > find some more choices there: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSGi_Specification_Implementations > > Cheers, > > David > > On 28 February 2014 10:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > FYI, Apache Karaf Cellar provides an DOSGi implementation based on > > Hazelcast. > > > > The default service provider lb is round robin by default > (I'm working to > > implement support of other algorithms). > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 02/28/2014 10:28 AM, Mike Wilson wrote: > >> > >> We're doing remote calls between OSGi containers on > different servers > >> and I'm looking at Remote Services to do the job. I've noticed that > >> Apache CXF/DOSGi http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi is > the reference > >> implementation. > >> DOSGi's distribution provider is based on SOAP so it seems this > >> implementation will limit the expressiveness in data transferred as > >> arguments and return values, such as duplicating objects that are > >> referenced more than once and not supporting cycles at all. > >> Can you recommend any Remote Service distribution provider > >> implementations that offer better support for keeping "referential > >> integrity" within the data transferred to the remote server? > >> Bonus question: What's a good setup for load balancing > Remote Service > >> calls between multiple remote servers? > >> Thanks > >> Mike Wilson > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OSGi Developer Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > >> > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > _______________________________________________ > > OSGi Developer Mail List > > [email protected] > > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev -- ----------------------- Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com <http://fusesource.com/> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
