Hi Ray, thats what I assume as well, but I couldn't find that explicitly specified in DS 1.3. If I did not oversee that it would be IMHO good to explicitly state that in the DS 1.4 Spec. WDYT? What is the process of getting an issue resolved in a newer spec version? Thanks, Konrad
> On 9 Mar 2017, at 16:27, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote: > > I do believe the order is always reversed natural ordering on the > ServiceReference. > > i.e. > - first; ordered by service.ranking property in descending order (highest > ranked first) > - second; ordered by service.id property in ascending order (oldest first) > > HTH, > - Ray > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de> wrote: > Can anyone comment or this, or do you want me to open a Bugzilla issue? > Thanks, > Konrad > > On 3 Mar 2017, at 08:42, Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > DS 1.3 added field injection and now supports Collections/Lists. > > Unfortunately it is only specified (in OSGi R6 Comp, §112.3.8.1) how those > > are ordered in case of dynamic references. What about having a static > > reference with multiple cardinality? > > I fail to see the according spec about the ordering of these. > > Is this an oversight on my side, or is this just missing from the spec? > > Can I assume that those are ordered as well according to > > ServiceReference.compareTo(...)? > > Thanks, > > Konrad > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > > > -- > Raymond Augé (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay) > Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance) > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
