> On 9 Mar 2017, at 20:14, BJ Hargrave <hargr...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > The ordering is the same regardless of whether the reference is static or > dynamic. > > I have clarified the text in 112.3.8.1 for this in the DS 1.4 spec.
Thanks a lot. > -- > > BJ Hargrave > Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781 > OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788 > hargr...@us.ibm.com > > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de> > Sent by: osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org > To: osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > Cc: > Subject: [osgi-dev] Order of injected services into a Collection/List field > Date: Fri, Mar 3, 2017 2:42 AM > > Hi, > DS 1.3 added field injection and now supports Collections/Lists. > Unfortunately it is only specified (in OSGi R6 Comp, ยง112.3.8.1) how those > are ordered in case of dynamic references. What about having a static > reference with multiple cardinality? > I fail to see the according spec about the ordering of these. > Is this an oversight on my side, or is this just missing from the spec? > Can I assume that those are ordered as well according to > ServiceReference.compareTo(...)? > Thanks, > Konrad > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
