Dear Dan,
my beans tell me that
selforganisation
is that force which has brought about everything since the Big Bang, the
same force that is active in man made systems... or in less structured
groups or events, where it surprises us more (which is strange since
those less structured groups or events have less structure or control
than "made" systems, inviting the force more readily).
When we say: "Hey, take a look how they self-organise!" (watching a
bunch of kids playing together without apparently any one directing this
activity), we are observing a manifestation of the force of
selforganisation.
(Just remembering: this is what I so clearly see in the man made system
or activity we call an OST-event, accompanied by the same expressions
you see in groups of "playing" children: laughter, frantic movement,
very rapid decisions, new constellations, heated discussion and lots of
giggling...)
This force, of course, can not exist since it can't be seen on our
instruments nor measured nor grasped with our primitive languages
(German included).
The effects of infringements, however, we readily see and I perceive
them often with pain as for instance interventions in the going ons at a
playground.
For me, assuming the existence of this force is a very practical theory
that finds immediate application in my practice as os-facilitator. Its
simple and elegant and its all I need to inform my practice as long as I
orient my action in relation to my assumption (simple but not easy,
another one of those life long challenges, a happy challenge, this one).
For some reason, I often cringe seeing the complex and intricate
endeavours to fathom, understand, get our hands on... the stuff that we
are, I think, not equipped to comprehend... still, wouldnt it be
wonderful to get there?
This might let us see how we get off the fence and reach that form of
organisation in which Everybody is the hero and the style is surfing...
and looking from there to the next horizon, where Nobody is the hero
(in this context the concept of "authority" has no place)
(see pp 105 of the Power of Spirit).
For a glimpse into an attempt to develope something on the other side of
the fence, I recommend (again!) a look at this report on Practicing Open
Space - Our First Ten Years
http://www.westkreuz-verlag.de/de/Practicing-Open-Space-Our-First-Ten-Years-E-Book
Greetings from Berlin
mmp
On 31.03.2014 20:47, Daniel Mezick wrote:
Peggy,
Thanks for your reply. You hit all my favorite notes here....and now you
got me going. I'm being triggered! I'm spilling my beans...
I currently believe that self-organization is actually the
high-frequency, dynamic sending and receiving of data about informal
authorization, by and between the members and the group. /
In other words, healthy self-organization in a human social system is
impossible without a continuous flow of 'authorization transactions'./
And it's a almost totally informal (mostly unconscious) process.
Certain beliefs I have about the self-organization of Agile software
teams follows from this belief. For example, I currently believe that
when the authorization to make decisions lies outside the team, that
team will not self-organize to do healthy goal-seeking. Instead they
will now self-organize around avoiding pain. In this case, there is
little (if any) flow of authorization transactions by and between the
members. We can expect a zombie-like team. A team where the spirit is
'down'.
If on the other hand the authorization to make decisions lies inside the
team, we can expect the team to self-organize around work-based
goal-seeking. In this case, there is a continuous flow of high-frequency
of authorization transactions by and between the members. We can expect
a lively team. A team where the spirit it "up".
On 3/31/14 11:00 AM, Peggy Holman wrote:
Dan,
You ask great questions!
My take: like most of life, authorization is more nuanced than your
statement below.
Like you, I believe everyone has 100% equivalent authorization AND
they also carry the imprinting of habits, context, self-talk, existing
relationships, and more that influence how they show up. Some will
experience themselves as having 100% authorization, some will test
that assumption, others will observe and reserve judgment, and every
other flavor in between.
I have observed that with repeated use, people seem to experience an
increasing sense of self-authorization. More take responsibility for
what they love not just in Open Space but in life.
I know of no practice that lays the groundwork better for increasing
self-authorization in social systems.
from sunny (at last) Seattle,
Peggy
_________________________________
Peggy Holman
Executive Director
Journalism that Matters
15347 SE 49th Place
Bellevue, WA 98006
425-746-6274
www.journalismthatmatters.net <http://www.journalismthatmatters.net>
www.peggyholman.com
Twitter: @peggyholman
JTM Twitter: @JTMStream
Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into
Opportunity
Check out my series on what's emerging in the news & information ecosystem
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:06 AM, Daniel Mezick <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This is very helpful for helping me understand your thinking. Thanks
for sending the rich detail and disclosure.
I am stuck. I continue to hold the belief that (quoting myself here...)
"Everyone...Sponsor included, has 100% equivalent authorization (100%
equivalent "right to do work" in the Open Space) as of the moment of
opening of the Bulletin Board and/or the opening of the Marketplace."
I wonder: if this is NOT actually true, how can the space be said to
be truly open? I wonder who has more "right to do work" than anyone
else... as of the opening of the Bulletin Board, and/or the opening
of the Marketplace, in an Open Space meeting.
Maybe there is no equivalence of authorization whatsoever in Open
Space, and I am simply barking up the wrong tree.
Daniel
On 3/31/14 9:41 AM, Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
Dear Dan,
as mostly, there is none or very little detailed thinking behind me
expressing the idea, that authority does not disappear just because
an os-event is taking place, and there is no levelling of authority,
which I assume you meant, when using the expression "equal standing".
This is all observation and experience, data I have taken in. In my
world, thats pretty important and utterly valid even if the stuff I
observe might be seen completely different by other observers.
Looking at myself, I have lots of authority of the kind that sort of
oozes out of me when standing in a circle, looking every one in the
eye, even if there are thousands and asking them to look around, at
the person to the right and to the left of them, behind them, at the
other side of the circcle, all the time slowly walking around the
circle... after I have done that twice everyone is smiling, looking,
focusing on each other away from me... and then my authority shifts
as I say nothing about open space but talk about the facts of life
(the principles) etc... and later I move in the authority of
invisibilty and presence...
I am not sure what happens to the participants but I have no data
that would indicate them reaching equal standing as far as authority
is concerned or that others will ignore the different kinds and
levels of authority that is associated with others representing
those, regardless of whether just assumed or in fact fact.
There have been experiential settings in which I have participated,
such as the desert game where the folks claiming to be authorities
on how to survive in a desert lead the group to certain death, or
Tavistock Laboratories where participants, me included, even though
we had all the space and freedom we wanted to take, used their
various authorities in intricate manners to re-create exactly the
kinds of organisational strutures they came from. So, authorities
are simply a fact of life, more or less useful, especially if
adaptable in the face of surprises.
What I do find very interesting, is your quest investigating
my thinking! I have pretty much given up investigating my own
thinking, let alone that of others. Seems to me that the only thing
that works for my passion to have the forces of selforganisation do
their thing (expanding time and space, if that is at all possible)
is to concentrate on the things I can somehow control: set up a
circle of chairs, etc.
Have a great day
mmp
On 30.03.2014 16:17, Daniel Mezick wrote:
Michael,
I am asking for help. May I investigate your thinking?
"...there is no such thing as an equal standing in authority terms."
Will you expose your detailed thinking behind your expression of this
one idea?
On 3/30/14 8:34 AM, Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
Dear Dan and everyone,
here are some bits from my experience:
---When I get a call or an email from someone asking me to facilitate
an ost-event I tell them to please arrange a "contact" meeting that
needs to be attended also by the person that will have the authority
to say yes or no at the end (usually the person that would pay my
fee). The purpose of the contact meeting is for the sponsor to find
out, whether the prerequisites for an OST event are sufficiently in
place. This meeting takes 60 to 90 minutes, no fee charged.
This process has nothing to do with OST, its simply what is needed
for
any kind of intervention of any kind of man-made organisation that is
embarking on such a venture.
---Participants in an OST event do not leave the authority
bestowed on
them in the wardrobe, there is no such thing as an equal standing in
authority terms. What does happen is that folks differently bestowed
with authority will, in contrast to what they usually do, follow
more
freely their "passion and responsibility" which, it seems, in some
way
increases their non-bestowed authority... the expanded space for the
forces of selforganisation, the real motor in an OST event, seems to
have this effect. Everyone, all participants, fully well know the
limitations that they will have to deal with "back in the asylum"
when
they follow their passion... and very often they are amazingly
elegant
and cunning in seeing their project through (responsible). That is
why
I encourage the folks in charge not to make any kind of promises
regarding what they will do to encourage projects emerging from the
ost event. Participants will get the conditions in place to see their
projects through.
---Yes, again my experience, coercion, control and such do shut down
open space, not completely though: I have seen the force in a dormant
stage and becoming quite alive when the conditions are right
(prerequisites in place)... isn't it our experience that big CONTROL
seems to shut down just about anything? In OST events I have actually
seen efforts of BiG control being met by counter-activity (this is
sometimes the effect of facilitator intervention when a space-invader
tries his stuff or, and even more effective, the "group" grappling
with space invasion/attempts at control... these observations I have
made when there is a really burning business issue and absolutely
nobody has the foggiest idea regarding the solution, least the folks
with "authority".
I really impress myself with your passion, Daniel. Maybe because I
also have been trying to refine my understanding, find precise
language, get my hands onto, etc. what it is that happens in
os-events
or even in os-organisations. In my os-facilitator-career, I have
increasingly given up trying to understand it and focus more on
what I
see happening... which has increased my faible for stories. By now, I
know that stories are fact, right, my facts.
Have a great Sunday,
cheers
mmp
On 30.03.2014 13:45, Daniel Mezick wrote:
Hi Michael, Everyone,
I'm sorry there are coercive mandates happening in Berlin, and
that you
have to experience them.
Regarding the Sponsor for an OST meeting,
I am saying that I believe this person must have enough formal
authority
("sufficient+1") to be able to actually arrange, budget and
convene the
meeting. And that the authority that the Sponsor holds is
conferred to
him or her by the organization. Is this true in OST?
Regarding the Participants,
I am saying that I believe that after the Marketplace opens, the
intention and in fact the reality of OST is that everyone has an
equal
standing in authority terms. At the start, no one person or group
has
any more authorization to act than any other person, regardless
of their
formally authorized role in the organization. Is this true in OST?
For the record, I am not at all in favor of mandates. I am
allergic to
them. I believe mandates and other forms of coercion strongly
discourage
self-organization by the imposition of external authority over the
person or group. Self-organization is impossible in scenarios where
individuals and groups are not free to choose. Is this true in OST?
This places out routinely EVERY SINGLE DAY in Agile adoptions.
Formally
authorized leadership imposes Agile practices on teams while at
the same
time encouraging teams to "self-organize". I for one have seldom
if ever
seen it actually work that way.
And so I have my questions about authority in Open Space.
I'm not being cute here: I'm hoping someone can help me
break/refine my
model of OST as it pertains to formal and informal authority, in the
Open Space. I'm trying to use more precise language to explain
what I
think is going on in OST. In my view, the 1 Law and the 5 Principles
make it clear everyone has equal informal authorization in OST,
regardless of their formal title. I some ways the formal titles are
suspended, as the space is held open for inquiry and dialogue.
This is my current belief. I asking for help in determining if this
belief is close to truth.
Related Links:
http://newtechusa.net/agile/authority-and-power/
http://newtechusa.net/agile/authority-explained/
Regards,
Daniel
On 3/30/14 5:23 AM, Michael M Pannwitz wrote:
Dear Dan, Jamie and Paul,
is there a new (5th or 6th) principle emerging?
Such as:
"Whoever is authorized is the right people?"
Or
"Whoever is mandated is the right people?"
Or is there a new prerequisite for the unfolding of the forces of
selforganisation in sight?
In addition to the 4,5 or 6 that we are often concerned about?
Such as:
"High level of authorisation"
or
"High level of mandation" (Palines for mandate, have a look at this
link
http://de.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Mandation
Or are these thoughts simply a manifestation of "old-paradigm",
remnants of the realm of control?
Control? Wasn't that the effort to shut down selforganisation
towards
zero?
Heavy stuff for a sundrenched Sunday morning in Berlin where I
and the
entire population (including dogs and cats and other pets kept in
human housing) are suffering from having been robbed of an hours
time
by authorities that are mandated to do such stuff.
Oh yes, before I forget, there was the notion that "passion and
responsibility" is all that is needed for "authorisation" (with the
nagging suspicion that folks driven by passion and
responsibility and
even taking action under those influences walk through the walls
and
obstacles set up by those authorized to raise them as if they were
thin air).
Greetings from Berlin
mmp
On 29.03.2014 21:57, Daniel Mezick wrote:
I am asking for help. Will you help me clarify my thinking?
I'm wondering if 100% equivalence in authorization for all
participants
is actually a key/defining characteristic of any genuine and
authentic
Open Space event...
First things first. Definitions:
Authority: The right to do specific work
Authorization: The conferring of authority
Formal Authority: Authorization conferred from the formal
organization
to a person. Example: "the CEO".
Informal Authority: Authorization conferred from peers,
colleagues and
co-workers. Example: "emergent leadership".
Now let's get into it. I currently think, and believe, that:
1. For an Open Space event inside an organization, the Sponsor
must
occupy a role with substantial formal authorization, definitely
more
than enough to actually authorize that OST event. The higher
the level
of formal authorization of the Sponsor, the better it is for
the event
overall.
2. The Sponsor authorizes the participants- the "invitees"-- to
meet
together, and do the specific work of exploring and
investigating the
Theme. This "authorized work" is done in "authorized
space"...in that
specific place, for a specific period of time. The Sponsor
explicitly
authorizes all of the above and conveys this message after they
stand
up, and before they sit down, at the opening.
2. The Facilitator is formally authorized by the Sponsor to do the
specific work of OST event. Absent this authorization, the
Facilitator
has no standing.
3. This is the big one: Everyone else, Sponsor included, has 100%
equivalent authorization (100% equivalent "right to do work")
as of
the
moment of opening of the Bulletin Board and/or the opening of the
Marketplace.
4. As the event progresses, authorization dynamics are in play.
These
"informal authorization" dynamics occur continuously throughout
the
day
in real time, moment by moment. Those who experience net
increases in
levels of informal authorization as of the end of the meeting have
membership in the "emergent leadership" group.
I am very interested in what experienced folks think about the
validity
of the assertion in (3) above.
Ex the Facilitator, does everyone else actually have 100%
equivalent
authorization in an OST meeting? Why or why not?
Is this 100% equivalence of authorization actually a key/defining
characteristic of any genuine and authentic Open Space event?
Thanks for any insight you may be able to provide, and
Kind Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for
the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston
<http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to
[email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston
<http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston
<http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston
<http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
--
Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000
Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 421 resident Open
Space Workers in 70 countries working in a total of 143 countries
worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
