Ok, so here is where Tavi Group Relations conference work intersects with OST 
work:

1/ In Gr work, they teach that every person present (even when silent) 
influences the social system with their presence

2/ ln OST, the butterfly (even when silent) does exactly the same thing

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 4, 2014, at 5:42 PM, Rosa Zubizarreta <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Harold!  I love this:
> 
> "I love how Open Space Technology helps people get in touch with their own 
> ability to create. To ripple the fabric of space-time."
> 
> Went to a three-day Group Relations conference in Boston a few years ago. It 
> was fascinating… I found it different in some significant ways that T-groups, 
> with which I'd had a not-so-positive experience before. Seems like T-groups 
> are much better known than Tavi. Too bad -- I found the Tavi experience much 
> richer in many ways. Challenging of course, yet also "safer" that T-groups in 
> a strange way…
> 
> To take off on a detour here, safety is another word that can have such 
> different connotations! For some people it equates with 'boring' and 
> 'mainstream'… Yet there's another sense of it, that I have a hard time 
> conveying… a friend of mine often says, "have a safe adventure!" For me, 
> there's something about wholeness, non-injury, belonging, connectedness… I 
> think of Harrison's story about the woman in OS who took off all her clothes, 
> and what happened next… for me this is also a metaphor for the self-healing 
> property of the Universe, the way it's always immediately beginning to 
> re-weave the fabric of integrity, after any injury or tear in it… 
> 
> and still, the existence of self-hearling is clearly no excuse for wanton 
> havoc… we deeply mourn the gashes, the strip-mines, the random death and 
> destruction… it's  so much easier to destroy something, than to nourish and 
> support growth…  
> 
> so i guess then, that is the other sense of "safety"… the avoidance of 
> unnecessary suffering… of course, we can learn from whatever suffering comes 
> our way, yet also value non-injury, health, wholeness… (the online 
> etymological dictionary tells me that "safety" comes from the Sanskrit 
> 'sarvah', which means "uninjured, intact, whole…."  
> 
> About "supporting growth": here I am clearly an OS heretic; in my experience 
> with plants or children, "self-organization" depends on so much nurturing 
> support! Whether it's fresh air, water, sunshine, good minerals in the soil, 
> all in reasonable doses… hugs, attention, listening, and yes, protection when 
> needed… 
> 
> So in T-group, "protection" is taboo; we can be witnessing the group turning 
> into a mob, seeking to "break" someone emotionally in order to get them to 
> "express their feelings," and anyone questioning this may be told to "speak 
> about your own self"… (some people I know, call them "insensitivity-training 
> groups"… :-) 
> 
> whereas in Tavi, the difference I saw, is that the purpose is not 'to get 
> individuals to get anything', but instead to support the development of an 
> experiential understanding, of the 'group unconscious' and how it moves…  and 
> so facilitators are much more likely to be inviting participants to question, 
> how any challenging individual may be 'doing the work of the group', than to 
> be tacitly encouraging an effort to 'confront' any particular individual in a 
> misguided effort to get them to 'get in touch with their feelings'…
> 
> and, if some individual chooses to 'challenge' someone else, and some other 
> individual chooses to 'defend' that person, neither one is given priority! In 
> both cases, it still comes back to, what is each individual acting out, for 
> the 'group as a whole' (who does not get to hide out in the 'being an 
> innocent bystander' role!) 
> 
>  in other words, how can each of us take more responsibility, for what is 
> happening here? (which for some of us, may be a place where Tavi and OS 
> converge… :-)
> 
> ***
> 
> So anyway, probably much longer of a response than you were seeking!
> thank you for the opportunity to revisit some of this…
> 
> with all best wishes,
> 
> Rosa
> 
> 
> Rosa Zubizarreta
> Diapraxis: Facilitating Creative Collaboration
> http://www.diapraxis.com
> 
> Celebrating my new book, "From Conflict to Creative Collaboration: A user's 
> guide to Dynamic Facilitation"!
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Harold Shinsato <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Rosa,
>> 
>> Would love to hear more of your experience with Group Relations some day. I 
>> learned a huge amount about myself and how groups work. I'm not sure how 
>> much everyone knows about GR and Tavistock. I find it interesting that many 
>> credit Kurt Lewin as one of the founders of organizational and social 
>> psychology, sociology, and organizational development. Kurt Lewin was one of 
>> founders of the Tavistock Institute.
>> 
>> Rosa, I like what you say about the feeling of "authorization". Even after 
>> understanding the Tavistock concepts around authority, I still get these 
>> instant images of a bureaucracy - filing cabinets, cold legal offices, 
>> clerks, and people making decisions behind closed doors. Ink stamps in 
>> passports. And "Your papers please?" Yuck.
>> 
>> How different the general feeling and poetic sense of this concept when you 
>> bring in the words "author" and "authorship".
>> 
>> The word author comes ultimately from the latin, "auctor", meaning creator. 
>> Creator!
>> 
>> Robert Heinlein wrote a time travel novel towards the end of his career 
>> where all the stories got tied together through a complex universe. I recall 
>> a review of the book mentioning people would be afraid in this Universe when 
>> an author came by. An author could change the fabric of space-time.
>> 
>> I love how Open Space Technology helps people get in touch with their own 
>> ability to create. To ripple the fabric of space-time.
>> 
>>     Thanks,
>>     Harold
>> 
>> 
>>     
>>  
>> 
>> On 3/31/14 7:35 PM, Rosa Zubizarreta wrote:
>>> Ok, plunging in here… deep waters!
>>> 
>>> One thing I'm noticing, is how words "sound" different, within different 
>>> communities… 
>>> 
>>> some of the posts above, seem to assume that "authorization" is about the 
>>> "standard" world view… 
>>> and sometimes, some parts of me resonate with that… it's a word that 
>>> initially felt very strange and "foreign" to me,
>>>  not at all "organic"…
>>> 
>>> and then, after some Tavi experiences, I've come to hear it in a much more 
>>> creative vein… 
>>> as in, who is the "author" of this story that I am experiencing?  Who is 
>>> it, who is really giving power to those, who I see as "powerful"? 
>>> 
>>> and so I've come to experience the whole notion of "authorship", within 
>>> that particular community, in a very           creative way… 
>>> 
>>> yet still, the word at times has older echoes of "authoritarian", and 
>>> "authority", 
>>> which don't resonate so well with these other, newer-to-me, usages… 
>>> 
>>> So, here is what I am hearing Dan say, and Harold clarifying further:
>>> Within an Open Space event , we are all equally invited to play (er, work… 
>>> same thing, in my book!)
>>> 
>>> What I am hearing a few others say (I see no contradiction here): Just by 
>>> virtue of stepping into an OS event, this does not alter the internalized 
>>> external authority structure that people are bringing in with them (at 
>>> least not immediately! ;-) 
>>> 
>>> my own experience echoes Peggy's and others: three consecutive days at an 
>>> Open Space event, certainly affected my           own sense of creative 
>>> freedom/agency/self-authorit)!  
>>> 
>>> thanks for the conversation, all…
>>> 
>>> best wishes,
>>> 
>>> Rosa
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rosa Zubizarreta
>>> Diapraxis: Facilitating Creative Collaboration
>>> http://www.diapraxis.com
>>> 
>>> Celebrating my new book, "From Conflict to Creative Collaboration: A user's 
>>> guide to Dynamic Facilitation"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:39 PM,             Harold Shinsato 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Dan, Peggy, Michael, David, Kári, Paul,
>>>> 
>>>> Such a rich topic.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't think Dan is "barking up the wrong tree at all".
>>>> 
>>>> Perhaps this is just my own experience, sensitivity, and upbringing - but 
>>>> I deeply resonate with the changing sense of authorization that happens in 
>>>> a good Open Space conference, and actually in most circle based processes, 
>>>> compared to the other more hierarchy based ones. And the spatial setup is 
>>>> critical here.
>>>> 
>>>> This was almost ridiculously confirmed in my experience of a Group 
>>>> Relations (GR) conference. We started in a theater style - the hosts and 
>>>> administration of our temporary institution - sitting like the judges and 
>>>> jury of our assembly. They claimed we the assembly had no rules, but when 
>>>> the group tried to rearrange the chairs in a circle, the leader 
>>>> de-authorized the conversation. No one dared again challenge the chair 
>>>> settings again. Also in my GR experience, there was another large group 
>>>> process - where we sat in a double spiral. It was fascinating to see the 
>>>> dynamic nature of authorization happening as people moved in and out of 
>>>> greater and lesser levels of authority (as granted by the assembly). My 
>>>> own experience of the OSList is we're more in a Spiral dynamic than in a 
>>>> circle. Just my experience. Since we're not in visual contact, it's a 
>>>> little harder to tell who is closer to the center as we speak/write on the 
>>>> OSList. But it's not that hard to tell.
>>>> 
>>>> A circle is inherently equalizing. Think of the Knights of the Round Table 
>>>> here. Maybe it doesn't make everyone equally authorized - but it does give 
>>>> a sense that we're all in it together, and that everyone matters, everyone 
>>>> counts. It's certainly harder to hide in a circle - but where does a 
>>>> circle start? Where does it end?
>>>> 
>>>> Obviously, OST is a lot more subtle than just the circle, the bulletin 
>>>> board that everyone is authorized to write on, the law of two feet, and 
>>>> the five principles. There's so much more to say. I hope the group doesn't 
>>>> deauthorize the importance of this topic.
>>>> 
>>>> A couple more points.
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Using GR vocabulary- I join with Paul Levy. I think Open Space is more 
>>>> about "moral authority". To me that is about enabling self-authorization. 
>>>> Maybe another possible term - intrinsic authorization. I love some of the 
>>>> thinking of the Rights described in the American Declaration of 
>>>> Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all [people] 
>>>> are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain 
>>>> unalienable Rights." Authority comes from the Creator - or you could say - 
>>>> it's already built in :-)
>>>> 
>>>> 2) I love the safety theme around authority, and I also join with David 
>>>> and Kári on that theme. This is all about the container. A good 
>>>> facilitator helps establish and hold a strong container. It's hard for the 
>>>> container to hold without a blessing from the kings and queens of the 
>>>> community - the Sponsor. This container needs rules of play that equalize 
>>>> the authority to "do work", which in an Open Space is to host and attend 
>>>> sessions, be a bumble bee or a butterfly. It doesn't matter how great the 
>>>> title someone has - once the container is set - it should be safe and 
>>>> without repercussions for someone to take hold of the center of the circle 
>>>> and announce their topic, not announce a topic, attend or not attend 
>>>> sessions. Those rules are not usually in play for most meetings. For 
>>>> example, at a Board meeting most people in an organization aren't even 
>>>> allowed to be there, let alone speak.
>>>> 
>>>>     Cheers,
>>>>     Harold
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/31/14 9:00 AM, Peggy Holman wrote:
>>>>> Dan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> You ask great questions! 
>>>>> 
>>>>> My take: like most of life, authorization is more nuanced than your 
>>>>> statement below.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Like you, I believe everyone has 100% equivalent authorization AND they 
>>>>> also carry the imprinting of habits, context, self-talk, existing 
>>>>> relationships, and more that influence how they show up. Some will 
>>>>> experience themselves as having 100% authorization, some will test that 
>>>>> assumption, others will observe and reserve judgment, and every other 
>>>>> flavor in between. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have observed that with repeated use, people seem to experience an 
>>>>> increasing sense of self-authorization. More take responsibility for what 
>>>>> they love not just in Open Space but in life.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I know of no practice that lays the groundwork better for increasing 
>>>>> self-authorization in social systems.
>>>>> 
>>>>> from sunny (at last) Seattle,
>>>>> Peggy
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Harold Shinsato
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://shinsato.com
>>>> twitter: @hajush
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSList mailing list
>>>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSList mailing list
>>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Harold Shinsato
>> [email protected]
>> http://shinsato.com
>> twitter: @hajush
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to