Hi Rosa,

Would love to hear more of your experience with Group Relations some day. I learned a huge amount about myself and how groups work. I'm not sure how much everyone knows about GR and Tavistock. I find it interesting that many credit Kurt Lewin as one of the founders of organizational and social psychology, sociology, and organizational development. Kurt Lewin was one of founders of the Tavistock Institute.

Rosa, I like what you say about the feeling of "authorization". Even after understanding the Tavistock concepts around authority, I still get these instant images of a bureaucracy - filing cabinets, cold legal offices, clerks, and people making decisions behind closed doors. Ink stamps in passports. And "Your papers please?" Yuck.

How different the general feeling and poetic sense of this concept when you bring in the words "author" and "authorship".

The word author comes ultimately from the latin, "auctor", meaning creator. Creator!

Robert Heinlein wrote a time travel novel towards the end of his career where all the stories got tied together through a complex universe. I recall a review of the book mentioning people would be afraid in this Universe when an author came by. An author could change the fabric of space-time.

I love how Open Space Technology helps people get in touch with their own ability to create. To ripple the fabric of space-time.

    Thanks,
    Harold




On 3/31/14 7:35 PM, Rosa Zubizarreta wrote:
Ok, plunging in here... deep waters!

One thing I'm noticing, is how words "sound" different, within different communities...

some of the posts above, seem to assume that "authorization" is about the "standard" world view... and sometimes, some parts of me resonate with that... it's a word that initially felt very strange and "foreign" to me,
 not at all "organic"...

and then, after some Tavi experiences, I've come to hear it in a much more creative vein... as in, who is the "author" of this story that I am experiencing? Who is it, who is really giving power to those, who I see as "powerful"?

and so I've come to experience the whole notion of "authorship", within that particular community, in a very creative way...

yet still, the word at times has older echoes of "authoritarian", and "authority",
which don't resonate so well with these other, newer-to-me, usages...

So, here is what I am hearing Dan say, and Harold clarifying further:
Within an Open Space event , we are all equally invited to play (er, work... same thing, in my book!)

What I am hearing a few others say (I see no contradiction here): Just by virtue of stepping into an OS event, this does not alter the internalized external authority structure that people are bringing in with them (at least not immediately! ;-)

my own experience echoes Peggy's and others: three consecutive days at an Open Space event, certainly affected my own sense of creative freedom/agency/self-authorit)!

thanks for the conversation, all...

best wishes,

Rosa


/Rosa Zubizarreta/
/Diapraxis: Facilitating Creative Collaboration
http://www.diapraxis.com <http://www.diapraxis.com/>/
/
/
/Celebrating my new book, "From Conflict to Creative Collaboration: A user's guide to Dynamic Facilitation" <http://www.amazon.com/Conflict-Creative-Collaboration-Dynamic-Facilitation/dp/1626526117/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1394491921&sr=1-1&keywords=from+conflict+to+creative+collaboration>/
/
/


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Harold Shinsato <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Dan, Peggy, Michael, David, Kári, Paul,

    Such a rich topic.

    I don't think Dan is "barking up the wrong tree at all".

    Perhaps this is just my own experience, sensitivity, and
    upbringing - but I deeply resonate with the changing sense of
    authorization that happens in a good Open Space conference, and
    actually in most circle based processes, compared to the other
    more hierarchy based ones. And the spatial setup is critical here.

    This was almost ridiculously confirmed in my experience of a Group
    Relations (GR) conference. We started in a theater style - the
    hosts and administration of our temporary institution - sitting
    like the judges and jury of our assembly. They claimed we the
    assembly had no rules, but when the group tried to rearrange the
    chairs in a circle, the leader de-authorized the conversation. No
    one dared again challenge the chair settings again. Also in my GR
    experience, there was another large group process - where we sat
    in a double spiral. It was fascinating to see the dynamic nature
    of authorization happening as people moved in and out of greater
    and lesser levels of authority (as granted by the assembly). My
    own experience of the OSList is we're more in a Spiral dynamic
    than in a circle. Just my experience. Since we're not in visual
    contact, it's a little harder to tell who is closer to the center
    as we speak/write on the OSList. But it's not that hard to tell.

    A circle is inherently equalizing. Think of the Knights of the
    Round Table here. Maybe it doesn't make everyone equally
    authorized - but it does give a sense that we're all in it
    together, and that everyone matters, everyone counts. It's
    certainly harder to hide in a circle - but where does a circle
    start? Where does it end?

    Obviously, OST is a lot more subtle than just the circle, the
    bulletin board that everyone is authorized to write on, the law of
    two feet, and the five principles. There's so much more to say. I
    hope the group doesn't deauthorize the importance of this topic.

    A couple more points.

    1) Using GR vocabulary- I join with Paul Levy. I think Open Space
    is more about "moral authority". To me that is about enabling
    self-authorization. Maybe another possible term - intrinsic
    authorization. I love some of the thinking of the Rights described
    in the American Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths
    to be self-evident, that all [people] are created equal, that they
    are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights."
    Authority comes from the Creator - or you could say - it's already
    built in :-)

    2) I love the safety theme around authority, and I also join with
    David and Kári on that theme. This is all about the container. A
    good facilitator helps establish and hold a strong container. It's
    hard for the container to hold without a blessing from the kings
    and queens of the community - the Sponsor. This container needs
    rules of play that equalize the authority to "do work", which in
    an Open Space is to host and attend sessions, be a bumble bee or a
    butterfly. It doesn't matter how great the title someone has -
    once the container is set - it should be safe and without
    repercussions for someone to take hold of the center of the circle
    and announce their topic, not announce a topic, attend or not
    attend sessions. Those rules are not usually in play for most
    meetings. For example, at a Board meeting most people in an
    organization aren't even allowed to be there, let alone speak.

        Cheers,
        Harold




    On 3/31/14 9:00 AM, Peggy Holman wrote:
    Dan,

    You ask great questions!

    My take: like most of life, authorization is more nuanced than
    your statement below.

    Like you, I believe everyone has 100% equivalent authorization
    AND they also carry the imprinting of habits, context, self-talk,
    existing relationships, and more that influence how they show up.
    Some will experience themselves as having 100% authorization,
    some will test that assumption, others will observe and reserve
    judgment, and every other flavor in between.

    I have observed that with repeated use, people seem to experience
    an increasing sense of self-authorization. More take
    responsibility for what they love not just in Open Space but in life.

    I know of no practice that lays the groundwork better for
    increasing self-authorization in social systems.

    from sunny (at last) Seattle,
    Peggy




-- Harold Shinsato
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://shinsato.com
    twitter: @hajush <http://twitter.com/hajush>

    _______________________________________________
    OSList mailing list
    To post send emails to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To unsubscribe send an email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org




_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org


--
Harold Shinsato
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://shinsato.com
twitter: @hajush <http://twitter.com/hajush>

Reply via email to