Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness

[Daniel Mezick via OSList]

Hi Harrison,

Thanks for the tips on how to search OSLIST and Google, etc. I did do 
those things actually. However, that's a bit of an effort, especially 
searching the OSLIST archives. I guess I could eventually pick up OSLIST 
culture that way, little by little. I suppose an earnest person with 
loads of time could sift through OSLIST archives to figure this culture 
out. The hard way.

However, like the SPIRIT book teaches, there is nothing like a good 
story to convey culture. The kind of story with a beginning, a middle 
and an end.

I notice that, when you are the one referring to a certain OS-mythos 
story, you usually tend to include the short list of pertinent details, 
the essential details that provide the essential context, so the reader 
can follow along, and engage.

And I'm always grateful for that, as it helps me to follow along, and 
get what you are referring to, and more fully understand the story, and 
feel oddly included in the story.


Earlier, I express how not having the context tends to (for me) arouse 
feelings of: exclusion, cluelessness, and a general lack of membership 
in whatever "historic-OS-mythos-episode" is being referred to. Sort of 
an "out group" feeling. You know? Sometimes, I wonder what the poster 
might be thinking by posting random fragments of a "you had to be there" 
kind of story. Other times, I wonder if other readers are also feeling 
these feelings. Or if it is "just me."

And so: I am very grateful for your stories, in part because you include 
the pertinent details, and in so doing, make me (for one) feel included.

So thanks for including the context in your stories. It makes them fun, 
and easy to follow. OSLIST culture certainly has it's quirks, and for 
me, your stories make this culture easier to figure out, and navigate, 
and enjoy.


Getting back to the Tyranny of Structurelessness:

Do you think these 3 assertions by the author are actually true? Do 
these ideas have legs?

 * /This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of
   "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal
   structures, only formal ones./
 * /For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given
   group and to participate in its activities, the structure must be
   explicit, not implicit. /
 * /It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured groups,
   which forms the basis for elites./


Daniel

On 10/6/15 10:04 AM, Harrison Owen wrote:

Dan, Google can often help. https://www.google.com/#q=ralph+copleman

ho

*From:*OSList [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] *On 
Behalf Of *Daniel Mezick via OSList
*Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2015 4:51 PM
*To:* Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email list
*Subject:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness

Howdy Harrison,

Thanks for describing the context of the Ralph Copleman story- I'm 
very thankful for that info.

I notice that, lots of times here, there are references made to 
notable OST episodes, and situations from times past...

...the "OST-mythos" as it were.

These mythical stories often have me wondering what I missed, and what 
I might now be missing. (Being clueless as I am.)

I'm sure these story-fragment postings are not posted with intent to 
exclude anyone, or to be discourteous, or unkind. More like: some good 
old basic camaraderie is taking place between some old friends.

Still: Do these "inside-story-fragments" on OSLIST tend to evoke 
feelings of exclusion in readers who were /not/ there at the time?

Not sure.

<CONFESSION>

As for me, personally, I sometimes find myself experiencing curiously 
odd feelings of exclusion, when a told-fragment of an old OST-mythos 
story lacks explicit context. So I can follow the story, you know? The 
terms "outsider" or "clueless" or  "not in the story" describe these 
feelings fairly well. "Not invited?"

I sometimes wonder if some of the hundreds of /other/ members of 
OSLIST ever feel this way...or if it is "just me."

</CONFESSION>

Daniel



On 10/4/15 2:59 PM, Harrison Owen via OSList wrote:

    “Everythingis moving.” .... Michael -- I remember that moment
    verywell. And Dan, I’m not sure the context, etc, would helpvery
    much. But just for the record the odd phrase popped out at one of
    the International Symposia on Organization Transformation which
    happened to be taking place at a small college south of Seattle. I
    have no idea why Ralph said what he did, and I’m not sure Ralph
    did either. But then againa lot of marvelous stuff seems to burst
    out with no obvious logic train. Indeed it may be that the lack of
    logic train enables the thought?

    Â

    Whatever the genesis, the phrase wandered about my head for some
    time, quite unattached, and it also happened that I was working my
    way slowly through one of the masterpieces of 20^th century
    western philosophy when a fuzzy connection began to form. The work
    was that of Alfred North Whitehead, and the title: “Process
    and Reality.” I’ve been through thebook probably 4-5 times,
    and I am frank to confess that I don’t think I really
    understandit. But then again I’veheard  a number of people with
    much greater credentials, tenure, etc – say the same thing. But
    I did get that ithad something to do with, “Everything is
    moving.” Andthe more I thought and read, the more I felt that
    the good philosopher had made a small mistake on his title. It
    shouldn’t be “Process/and/ Reality,” but
    rather“Process*is* Reality.”

    Â

    Now, Anna Caroline we come to “structure,” or perhaps Ishould
    say the fallacy of Structure? Yes I know – we’ve all been
    taught that structure is the precursor, the “determinator” of
    everything. My face looks as it doesbecause of my bone structure.
    My life proceeds the way it does because of my social structure.
    My business works as it does because of the organizational
    structure. And of course, meetings happen the way they do because
    of meeting structure, which apparently is the prime domain
    of “facilitators.” And even if we hadn’t been“taught”
    all this, the primacy of structure would appearto be blatantly
    obvious – as plain as the nose on yourface.

    Â

    Unfortunately, it does seem to turn out that sometimes the
    blatantly obvious is not necessarily so. For example just looking
    at things it is pretty clear that the world is flat, or at the
    least bumpy flat. And any fool can see that we are the center of
    it all – Sun, moon, and stars whiz around us. But when we think
    about it, as we have been doing for the last 500-600 years, the
    obvious isn’t so obvious.

    Â

    It is reasonable to ask what would start to make us think
    differently – to the point that we begin to question theobvious,
    and even come to see things in a different way? Taking a leap, I
    will suggest that it all begins with the perception of anomaly.
    Things just don’t make sense. Our eyes tell us one thing...
    but???? And then we start making up stories to explain the
    apparently unexplainable. We imagine different ways of looking at
    things so that the nonsensical makes sense. Some of those stories
    get pretty strange, but if they actually work – that is to say,
    helpus to see in new and useful ways – that’s great!

    Â

    There is, of course, a proper term for the activity I have been
    describing. It is called Theory Building. And for whatever it is
    worth, “theory” comes from the Greek “/theoreinâ//€/– to
    see. In a word, theories are ways of looking atthings – likely
    stories you might say.

    Â

    Now, at long last (too long?) we come to the odd story I was
    starting to tell, to the effect that Structure is only a figment
    of our imagination, a flash frame of a moment gone by.
    Interesting, and helpful under some circumstances... but always
    partial and in a sense illusory. What’s“really” happening is
    all flow. Everything is moving –That’s Ralph’s story, and I
    guess it is mine too.

    Â

    So how did I get to such a weird condition? It was all about
    anomaly – more particularly, the anomaly of Open
    Space.Everything that I had ever learned told me that it could not
    work. Unfortunately it did (work) – and not just once, butevery
    time, hundreds of thousands of times. Something was definitely
    weird. It seemed to me that I had to re-consider all those things
    I thought I had learned, beginning with the basics... such things
    as Structure.

    Â

    Common sense would say that Open Space works because we somehow
    created a structure that enabled it to work. That’s theway
    things get done, or so I had been taught. But that’snot the way
    things happened in Open Space. Structure emerged along the way and
    only momentarily. Worse yet it (structure) seemed to have little
    to do with the obvious power, connections, creativity.... all of
    which created structures, and passed them by. And actually it
    always seemed to me that the “structures” I “saw” existed
    only because Iwanted to see them – or perhaps that I
    “should” seethem. But they were only momentary wisps,
    figments – neverto be mistaken for what was really going on. Or
    so I’vebeen thinking.

    Â

    Harrison

    Â

    Â

    Â

    Â

    Â

    Â

    *From:*OSList [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] *On
    Behalf Of *Michael Herman via OSList
    *Sent:* Saturday, October 03, 2015 6:31 PM
    *To:* JL Walker; World wide Open Space Technology email list
    *Subject:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness

    Â

    you remind me, harrison, of one morning news session years ago,
    somewhere, probably OT... where ralph copleman walked to the
    center of the circle and announced, all serious and mischievous at
    the same time, "it's all moving!" Â

    Â

    then put the stick down and went back to his seat.Â


    Â
    --

    Michael Herman
    Michael Herman Associates
    http://MichaelHerman.com
    http://OpenSpaceWorld.org

    Â

    On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, JL Walker via OSList
    <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:

    I was thinking that maybe the antidote to the eventual tyranny of
    structurelessness is to open space, again and again, until true
    democracy can emerge.

    Â

    Juan Luis

    Â

    *De:*OSList [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org>] *En nombre de
    *Rosa Zubizarreta via OSList
    *Enviado el:* sábado, 03 de octubre de 2015 12:19
    *Para:* Daniel Mezick; World wide Open Space Technology email list
    *Asunto:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness

    Â

    Hi Daniel,

    Yes, this is a key piece... I see it as very similar in some ways
    to what Ken Wilber wrote later,

    about the "shadow side of the green meme". (Each meme has its own
    shadow, as well as its own gift...)

    So, I love "green". I love circles, I love non-hierarchy, etc.
    And, part of the "shadow side of the green meme" is how
    ideologically anti-structure it can become...

    to the point where some people may not even agree that OST does,
    in fact, offer a very simple and effective structure.

    By way contrast, think of a situation where group of people (who
    don't know about OST, and/or, who are having a power struggle
    around "which process to use", and/or....  ) might easily
    spending a whole weekend arguing /about /"how to self-organize
    ourselves"... with a great deal more pain and frustration and a
    great deal less value.

    whereas, instead, IF someone knows about OST, and, a clear
    invitation has been extended, and, there is enough
    trust/suspension of disbelief so that participants are willing to
    enter into that format,

    then, we end up with a very simple and elegant structure that
    allows people to self-organize beautifully....

    at least that's how i see it! :-)

    with all best wishes,

    Rosa

    Â


    */Rosa Zubizarreta/*

    /Developing Participatory and Co-intelligent Leadership
    Author of *From Conflict to Creative Collaboration*
    <http://www.conflict2creativity.com>/

    /For more resources and learning opportunities, visit
    *www.DiaPraxis.com <http://www.DiaPraxis.com>*/

    Â

    On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Daniel Mezick via OSList
    <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:

    THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
    by Jo Freeman aka Joreen

    I find this essay extremely interesting. I hope you do, too.



    Here is a pertinent quote, from the essay:
    ".../the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the
    formation of informal structures, only formal ones."

    /
    Circa 1970. Context: the women's movement. Quick summary of the
    main points: from the essay...

    /During the years in which the women's liberation movement has
    been taking shape, a great emphasis has been placed on what are
    called leaderless, structureless groups as the main -- if not sole
    -- organizational form of the movement. /

    /The idea of "structurelessness," however, has moved from a
    healthy counter to those tendencies, to becoming a goddess in its
    own right./

    /Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is no such
    thing as a structureless group. /

    /This means that to strive for a structureless group is as
    useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an "objective" news story,
    "value-free" social science, or a "free" economy. A "laissez
    faire" group is about as realistic as a "laissez faire" society;
    the idea becomes a smokescreen for the strong or the lucky to
    establish unquestioned hegemony over others. /

    /This hegemony can be so easily established because the idea of
    "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation of informal
    structures, only formal ones. /

    /For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a given
    group and to participate in its activities, the structure must be
    explicit, not implicit. /

    /It is this informal structure, particularly in Unstructured
    groups, which forms the basis for elites./



    Just in case you have not yet encountered the full text of this
    essay, here it is:

    THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
    by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
    http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm



    Regards,
    Daniel
    http://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com/about
    http://www.DanielMezick.com
    203 915 7248 <tel:203%20915%207248>


    _______________________________________________
    OSList mailing list
    To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To unsubscribe send an email to
    oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
    Past archives can be viewed here:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

    Â


    _______________________________________________
    OSList mailing list
    To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To unsubscribe send an email to
    oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
    Past archives can be viewed here:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

    Â




    _______________________________________________

    OSList mailing list

    To post send emails toosl...@lists.openspacetech.org 
<mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>

    To unsubscribe send an email tooslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>

    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:

    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

    Past archives can be viewed 
here:http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

--

Daniel Mezick, President

New Technology Solutions Inc.

(203) 915 7248 (cell)

Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog 
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter 
<http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.Â

Examine my new book:Â The Culture Game 
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the 
Agile Manager.

Explore Agile Team Training 
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching. 
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

Explore the Agile Boston 
<http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/>Community.Â


--

Daniel Mezick, President

New Technology Solutions Inc.

(203) 915 7248 (cell)

Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog 
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.

Examine my new book:The Culture Game 
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the 
Agile Manager.

Explore Agile Team Training 
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching. 
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org