Real status of the way is irrelevant.
The only thing that matters is if it is recorded in Osm data, respectively
reflected in osmand obf maps.
In this case it clearly is not, as for what you have provided there is no
tag hint for being unpaved.
The only way to fix it is to correct Osm data.
On 2 May 2017 13:43:37 "'P Wat' via Osmand" <[email protected]> wrote:
A case of "Unpaved road not avoided in Bike profile" exists at 51.524592,
-0.991479.
Navigatrion was set to "Osmand" & "Avoid unpaved roads".
I was approaching from North-East and was directed to turn left onto the
footpath running south east from the paved road
The path is clearly unpaved. See attached pic. or street view. The OSM
data seems to be adequate "designation
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation?uselang=en-US>
public_footpath - foot
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot?uselang=en-US> designated
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot=designated?uselang=en-US> -
highway <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway?uselang=en-US>
footway
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway?uselang=en-US>."
Why does this happen.
What should one do to prevent it?
Paul W
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 7:25:00 AM UTC+1, Poutnik wrote:
Have you checked, if OSM data provides explicit unpaved tag hints for
affected ways ?
As many ways have no surface= tag, or quality is provided indirectly via
tag tracktype=,
or not at all.
Note that incoming upgrade of OSMAnd provide huge upgrade of the
routing.xml
<https://raw.githubusercontent.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/master/routing/routing.xml>
file,
so I would try to download and install not yet released new OSMAnd 2.6.1
<http://download.osmand.net/releases/?C=M;O=D> .
You can easily examine a/o share the current OSM tagging* of affected ways
e.g. via providing a link to the particular provided route on Brouter-web
server.
<http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#zoom=15&lat=49.23127&lon=16.47919&layer=OpenStreetMap&lonlats=16.465673,49.2329%7C16.467519,49.236907%7C16.475844,49.238673%7C16.480823,49.242147&nogos=&profile=trekking&alternativeidx=0&format=geojson>
If you go on the desktop to the left on DATA tab,
you can see table of routing related way segment tags.
Such a table is downloadable also as a CSV download.
* with some 7-10 day delay wrt primary OSM data
Dne 07/04/2017 v 07:54 Nick Payne napsal(a):
I have OsmAnd+ 2.5.4 installed on a Google Pixel running the latest 7.1.2
Android update. In OsmAnd navigation settings for bicycle, I have "Avoid"
set to avoid toll roads and unpaved, but when I ask the app to provide
bicycle directions, if the directions take me to rural areas it quite
frequently routes me onto unpaved roads, even though the app is set to
avoid them.
--
Poutnik ( The Wanderer )
My Brouter profiles https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
