Thanks for all that - I'll work on it, when I know my way. When I don't, I'll use Bruter! :) Paul W ================ On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 3:17:00 PM UTC+1, Poutnik wrote: > > The most accurate optipn would be what particular surface is there. > surface=unpaved should be used > ONLY if you have no idea what the surface is. > > The tag tracktype is not considered a subjective tag, in contrary to > smoothness. Many tracks e.g. have tracktype tag, but not surface tag. > > Brouter profiles also regularly coping with ways > tha are neither ( explicitly )paved, neither ( explicitly) unpaved. > > Aside of that, highway=track tracktype=grade1 > can be considered as paved with quite confidence, > even if surface tag is not provided. > > > On 05/02/2017 04:09 PM, 'P Wat' via Osmand wrote: > >>Poutnik > > Right - "Surface = Unpaved" seems like the most accurate option, and > > should tell OsmAnd what to do, also, it is less subjective than > > "tracktype" or "smoothness". > > Using Potlatch 2 in advanced mode seems like the way forward. As such, > > problem solved, thanks. > > > > Even so, it is rather worrying that there is likely to be a plethora of > > paths of this type, as yet not tagged "unsurfaced", and OsmAnd ought to > > have a way of coping with it, (as Brouter does!) > > Paul W > > -- > Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) > > https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
