The most accurate optipn would be what particular surface is there.
surface=unpaved should be used
ONLY if you have no idea what the surface is.
The tag tracktype is not considered a subjective tag, in contrary to
smoothness. Many tracks e.g. have tracktype tag, but not surface tag.
Brouter profiles also regularly coping with ways
tha are neither ( explicitly )paved, neither ( explicitly) unpaved.
Aside of that, highway=track tracktype=grade1
can be considered as paved with quite confidence,
even if surface tag is not provided.
On 05/02/2017 04:09 PM, 'P Wat' via Osmand wrote:
Poutnik
Right - "Surface = Unpaved" seems like the most accurate option, and
should tell OsmAnd what to do, also, it is less subjective than
"tracktype" or "smoothness".
Using Potlatch 2 in advanced mode seems like the way forward. As such,
problem solved, thanks.
Even so, it is rather worrying that there is likely to be a plethora of
paths of this type, as yet not tagged "unsurfaced", and OsmAnd ought to
have a way of coping with it, (as Brouter does!)
Paul W
--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
