"'Xavier' via Osmand" <[email protected]> writes: >> But, my point is that for a motorway_link, for routing purposes, it >> is not reasonable to assume 65 mph as the speed. 30 mph is a far >> better assumption in terms of causing the chosen routes to be sane. > > Agreed. Doing nothing more than using maxspeed/2 of the main road for > the _link roads would produce a better approximation. > > Using maxspeed:advisory would be better, as not all link roads are > signed at maxspeed/2 relative to their main roads.
offlist since this is getting to nits. I completely agree that using maxspeed:advisory if present on a link road is the thing to do. I just mean that if that's not present, then half the default for the non-link type should be used. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
