Jack Burke <[email protected]> writes: > OsmAnd does use maxspeed:advisory when just plain maxspeed=* is > absent. Has used it for a while now.
But what about when both are present? In the US, we have the situation where on ramps (link roads, slip roads) the regulatory white sign will be the one from the highway (often 65 mph) and then there will be an advisory yellow sign saying something lower, sometimes as low as 20 mph. Then there is maxspeed:typical. So it seems that it should use the first of maxspeed:typical maxspeed:advisory maxspeed that is present, but it sounds like you are saying that osmand only uses maxspeed:advisory when plain maxspeed is missing. The real question for routing is "at what speed can we expect that a reasonable driver will traverse whis segment". That's why I put typical first. There is a ramp near me where (reality, not sure of todays' tagging) maxspeed:typical= 40 mph maspeeed:advisory= 20 mph maxspeed= 65 mph I realize it varies from country to country, but in many parts of the US the relationship between regulation and reality is quite off. Having driven in the UK, I can realize how this would seem very strange to UK drivers who have not experienced the US outside of large cities. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
