Almost all navigation apps are faster than OsmAnd (at least all I know and
I know a lot). Also on a phone. Mapfactor Navigator is extremely fast.
Magic Earth is also very fast. Etcetera, etcetera.

The computing power of the phone is not the issue. Of course it is less
than the dataventers of Google and Waze.

The issue is OsmAnd and its heuristic coefficient of 1.0. Not any other
application is doing that.

If I calculate a route in OsmAnd of 217 km with the default routing profile
(routing.xml), it takes 1m and 6~8 seconds.
If I calculate the exact same route with my routing profile with a
heuristic coefficient of 1.5, it takes 6~7 seconds to calculate

When calculating a route of 394 km, it was at 30% after 3 minutes with the
original routing.xml
With my routing.xml it took 15~16 seconds.

I used to need to do some "tweaking" to make this work.
Since version 3.5.4, with a very buggy 3.5.5, and now a stable 3.6.2 you
can define profiles.
Now it is a piece of cake to use another routing.xml on top of the default.

I have already written many mails about this in the past 6 years, and
lately another series when profiles were introduced in OsmAnd and shared my
several profiles.

So much for phone computing power and a way over the top calculation
algorithm (my point ov view).

Harry

Op do 5 mrt. 2020 om 16:10 schreef John Whelan <[email protected]>:

> Brouter is fast and can be run on a smartphone.  It is dedicated to
> routing.  However it does take up resources so on a slower phone or one
> without so much memory OSMAND will still run without Brouter.
>
> OSMAND gets the routing job done.  It might not be the fastest on the
> planet but it works.
>
> Just because something has not changed for many years does not mean it
> needs to.
>
> If you feel the devs are lacking in expertise then feel free to develop
> your own app.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> Episteme PROMENEUR wrote on 2020-03-05 9:57 AM:
>
> Same answer. You don't answer to the question.
>
> No improvement since many years, where is the problem ?
> What is the problem ? No expert in Osmand team ? Not enough devs ?
> Something else ?
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OsmAnd" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/86746d7f-f827-485f-bb9c-9af57f413c2c%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/86746d7f-f827-485f-bb9c-9af57f413c2c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
> --
> Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OsmAnd" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/77405db7-b42e-9a47-1a63-ece742ccf644%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/77405db7-b42e-9a47-1a63-ece742ccf644%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CAGARPpuOxb4_GfaX64WtF1p-AqKW%3Df8V4LBN9HX3pooK_GrQVg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to