superb, harry! was that done with setting FASTEST route or ENERGY SAVING? without being able to award you ANY price (besides a beer to be picked up here ;-) I would so very much like to see THESE very interesting differences. and to the above with the added setting AVOID HIGHWAYS - we all could learn so much! already your statement of HC1.0 being wrong seems undoubtably proven.
Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 14:04:50 UTC+1 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > This is a spin-off of the original topic. > > I just did a number of route calculations for the different heuristic > coefficients being hc=1.0 (default OsmAnd), hc=1.2 and hc=1.5 > I took the routing.xml, copied the car routing profile out of it and made > my own routing.xml (the earlier mentioned mycar15.xml and mycar2.xml) > Done with OsmAnd+ 3.6.3, maps: mixture of February and March on Motorola > G6-plus (4GB) on Android 9 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/71307ebe-7f4f-46a5-8c6e-71cba7f4685a%40googlegroups.com.
