A Thompson <[email protected]> writes: > In both examples, both the motorway and the exiting motorway_link are > tagged: > > maxspeed=100 > > maxspeed:conditional=130 @ (19:00-06:00) > > > however the motorway_link to rejoin is simply tagged: > > maxspeed=130
Wow, that is surprising. We have had lots of instances of thi problem where the motorway has a tagged maxspeed which is below normal, and the link inherits the motorway default. There, the problem is that link roads should have a default that is 50-75% (depending on who you ask) of the non-link default. That's pretty well agreed on, and I'm not sure it's fixed. But in this case, there are explicit tags, and either they are wrong and should be fixed, or they are right and the route really is good. I can see the "link road penalty" argument, where I define penalty as an additional time/distance that *IS NOT* a model of how long it will really take. For example, a left turn penalty of 1 minute means to add a minute for a left turn, above and beyond the amount that waiting and turning is actually expected to take. In this case, the map should be fixed, perhaps with maxspeed:advisory or maxpeed:practical. Even here in the US where people drive 130 all the time (on roads signed 105! and they are in the US so they think of it as 80 :), the idea of 130 on a link road seems crazy to me. I wouldn't epxect that even in Texas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/rmift6mdvu7.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
