At 1:05 AM -0700 27/5/08, Kevin Callahan wrote:
>On May 27, 2008, at 12:42 AM, David Cake wrote:
>
>> At 12:28 PM +0100 26/5/08, Jared ''Danger'' Earle wrote:
>>> On 26 May 2008, at 12:03, Stefano Mori wrote:
>>>> Is this what she said?
>>>
>>> She invoked it so it'd be at the forefront of people's minds. She
>>> invoked it so we'd all be thinking "oh yes, Obama might be shot so
>>> it'd be good if she were on standby."
>>
>> I think her explanation that she was just reaching for an example of
>> a primary that was determined late on is plausible.
>
>she said it back in March -
Yes. She made a bad analogy then, when looking for a similar
explanation for how all sorts of things could happen, didn't get
savagely slammed for it then, so used it again -- only this time she
did get savagely slammed for it.
Its a crass comment, but plausible.
Cheers
David
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
