Wow,
Terrianne you realy gave it the once-over.  I agree with you that we are a profession 
which was saturated by an undesirable group due to expanding slaries and demand.  
Thank you for your insight and opinion.
Jimmie Arceneaux
On Mon, 10 September 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Ok, I am going to take a stab here at what is a very complex issue...I myself
> have pondered this very question and have come up with the following conclusion.
> 
> One:  the roots of this profession, as far as treatment venues are concerned,
> are with the Army.  As with anything closely associated with the government
> (until very recent history that is), there becomes a sort of complacency about
> having to explain the rationale for why something is or why it even exists.
> 
> Two:  Building upon fact one above, for many years the VA and government run
> psychiatric facilities were the  largest employers of OT's.  Same analysis.
> 
> Three: Enter Medicare and mandated coverage for services. OT is a covered
> service; no questions asked. Hence there is no need to explain or even
> differentiate ourselves from PT.   OTgets reimbursed because it is on the list
> of covered services.
> 
> Four:  Now the mandated service is extended to the public schools.  Same
> scenario as above.
> 
> Five: enter managed care. and its infiltrating influence to the government
> programs, culminating in health care with the Balance Budget act of 1997.
> Suddenly everything is being scrutinzed as never before.
> 
> 
> Througout the history of this profession, we have privately (in our own little
> professional body) expressed our exasperation at the lack of understanding of OT
> to the public and to our colleagues in other professions.  I am sure there have
> been many efforts by individual practitioners or even by subgroups within OT to
> promote the profession.  But the bottom line is this:  we have never been
> collectively challenged to justify our existance until very recently.  And the
> result is a profession that has gotten lazy.....again, I know that there are and
> have been dedicated OT's doing research, fighting to make a name for OT etc.,
> and thank God for them!   And our founders, what a vison they had of  what OT
> could be!  But something has gone wrong in this profession since about the 60's
> on...Until 3 years ago,  if you asked your average OT on the street how critical
> it is to make OT known, I don't think you would have gotten the same response
> you would get today.
> 
> Before I rile too many more people up, let me add this:  I remember in 1992, as
> a FW student, asking my supervisiors why something was "OT" or why it
> wasn't....I was at a VA and a community hospital psychiatric unit in a major
> metropolitan area known for cranking out OT's.  I remember  vividly the day
> that my Supervisior at the psych hospital said: "Just do a good job and make
> sure the clients like OT...don't worry  so much about what OT is or isn't...we
> are a covered service and they wouldn't know what to do with the patients all
> day without us".  I remember even as a very green young therapist how taken
> aback I was by her response.  I was depressed to realize that even she didn't
> care to know if what we were doing made any difference.
> 
> Fast forward one year, 1993 to my job as a staff therapist at a large regional
> medical center.  Here I am, new graduate, looking up to senior therapists as
> mentors.  Out of a group of 25 OT's, there were 2 that were members of AOTA or
> the state association.  Two.  If the hospital didn't pay for it, then they
> didn't do it.  This was a group of well compensated (the height of the add on
> bonus era I might add) group of people who had no excuse not to support the
> profession.  I remember them saying "AOTA doesn't do anything for me".
> Continuing ed was seen as a way for the hospital to pay for a trip somewhere and
> a few days away for the clinic.  I again remember the department director saying
> "they love OT at this hospital..  we and PT are the bread and butter around
> here.  We make money for the hospital".
> 
> As time progressed and I became more experienced, I wanted to engage in research
> in the clinic.  I was shot down.  "we don't need to do that" I was told again
> and again.
> 
> Then the reimbursement started tightening up thanks to manged care and suddenly
> the pressure was on.  Now the excuse to not engage in research was that
> productivity would be an issue.  And then turf wars really heated up....I could
> go on and on.
> 
> 
> Let me conclude with this: If you are reading this diatribe you are not likely
> part of the problem...you ARE a dedicated  OT, trying to prove our worth and
> asking the tough questions.  It is our colleagues who were signed on for the
> good times only (read:  many of the  graduates from the mid eighties  until
> 1996...) that were lured into the profession by lucrative salaries, etc., who
> are hindering NOT HELPING our cause.  And they are leaving the profession in
> droves, and I for one am glad.  Let a new crop of dedicated students who will be
> prepared to engage in research and ask the tough questions come into the
> profession knowing full well the challenges ahead.
> 
> I am now in an academic setting where I feel like I can do my part to encourage
> students to support the profession and articulate what OT is and what it isn't.
> One area of research I hope to engage in is to study the impact on a profession
> when sign on bonuses and inflated salaries are major enticements to enter a
> profession.   The literature from the business sector indicates that ultimately
> the practice backfires and committment to an organization (or in our case , a
> profession) are even lower than before all the incentives were added on.
> 
> Well, let me have it!  Prove me wrong every one out there!  I want to hear it
> loud and clear.  Thanks, Terrianne
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ********************
> 
> Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, put 
>the following text:
> 
> unsubscribe OTlist
> 
> ------
> 
> OTnow messages are archived at:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> ********rC***********


Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com

********************

Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, put 
the following text:

unsubscribe OTlist

------

OTnow messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

********rC***********

Reply via email to