Hello Terrianne:

THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your thought-provoking words.  You have given
us (the list) much food for thought.

With your permission, I wish to let my psychosocial OT class read your
message.

Thanks,

Ron

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 9/10/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



tse> Ok, I am going to take a stab here at what is a very complex issue...I myself
tse> have pondered this very question and have come up with the following conclusion.

tse> One:  the roots of this profession, as far as treatment venues are concerned,
tse> are with the Army.  As with anything closely associated with the government
tse> (until very recent history that is), there becomes a sort of complacency about
tse> having to explain the rationale for why something is or why it even exists.

tse> Two:  Building upon fact one above, for many years the VA and government run
tse> psychiatric facilities were the  largest employers of OT's.  Same analysis.

tse> Three: Enter Medicare and mandated coverage for services. OT is a covered
tse> service; no questions asked. Hence there is no need to explain or even
tse> differentiate ourselves from PT.   OTgets reimbursed because it is on the list
tse> of covered services.

tse> Four:  Now the mandated service is extended to the public schools.  Same
tse> scenario as above.

tse> Five: enter managed care. and its infiltrating influence to the government
tse> programs, culminating in health care with the Balance Budget act of 1997.
tse> Suddenly everything is being scrutinzed as never before.


tse> Througout the history of this profession, we have privately (in our own little
tse> professional body) expressed our exasperation at the lack of understanding of OT
tse> to the public and to our colleagues in other professions.  I am sure there have
tse> been many efforts by individual practitioners or even by subgroups within OT to
tse> promote the profession.  But the bottom line is this:  we have never been
tse> collectively challenged to justify our existance until very recently.  And the
tse> result is a profession that has gotten lazy.....again, I know that there are and
tse> have been dedicated OT's doing research, fighting to make a name for OT etc.,
tse> and thank God for them!   And our founders, what a vison they had of  what OT
tse> could be!  But something has gone wrong in this profession since about the 60's
tse> on...Until 3 years ago,  if you asked your average OT on the street how critical
tse> it is to make OT known, I don't think you would have gotten the same response
tse> you would get today.

tse> Before I rile too many more people up, let me add this:  I remember in 1992, as
tse> a FW student, asking my supervisiors why something was "OT" or why it
tse> wasn't....I was at a VA and a community hospital psychiatric unit in a major
tse> metropolitan area known for cranking out OT's.  I remember  vividly the day
tse> that my Supervisior at the psych hospital said: "Just do a good job and make
tse> sure the clients like OT...don't worry  so much about what OT is or isn't...we
tse> are a covered service and they wouldn't know what to do with the patients all
tse> day without us".  I remember even as a very green young therapist how taken
tse> aback I was by her response.  I was depressed to realize that even she didn't
tse> care to know if what we were doing made any difference.

tse> Fast forward one year, 1993 to my job as a staff therapist at a large regional
tse> medical center.  Here I am, new graduate, looking up to senior therapists as
tse> mentors.  Out of a group of 25 OT's, there were 2 that were members of AOTA or
tse> the state association.  Two.  If the hospital didn't pay for it, then they
tse> didn't do it.  This was a group of well compensated (the height of the add on
tse> bonus era I might add) group of people who had no excuse not to support the
tse> profession.  I remember them saying "AOTA doesn't do anything for me".
tse> Continuing ed was seen as a way for the hospital to pay for a trip somewhere and
tse> a few days away for the clinic.  I again remember the department director saying
tse> "they love OT at this hospital..  we and PT are the bread and butter around
tse> here.  We make money for the hospital".

tse> As time progressed and I became more experienced, I wanted to engage in research
tse> in the clinic.  I was shot down.  "we don't need to do that" I was told again
tse> and again.

tse> Then the reimbursement started tightening up thanks to manged care and suddenly
tse> the pressure was on.  Now the excuse to not engage in research was that
tse> productivity would be an issue.  And then turf wars really heated up....I could
tse> go on and on.


tse> Let me conclude with this: If you are reading this diatribe you are not likely
tse> part of the problem...you ARE a dedicated  OT, trying to prove our worth and
tse> asking the tough questions.  It is our colleagues who were signed on for the
tse> good times only (read:  many of the  graduates from the mid eighties  until
tse> 1996...) that were lured into the profession by lucrative salaries, etc., who
tse> are hindering NOT HELPING our cause.  And they are leaving the profession in
tse> droves, and I for one am glad.  Let a new crop of dedicated students who will be
tse> prepared to engage in research and ask the tough questions come into the
tse> profession knowing full well the challenges ahead.

tse> I am now in an academic setting where I feel like I can do my part to encourage
tse> students to support the profession and articulate what OT is and what it isn't.
tse> One area of research I hope to engage in is to study the impact on a profession
tse> when sign on bonuses and inflated salaries are major enticements to enter a
tse> profession.   The literature from the business sector indicates that ultimately
tse> the practice backfires and committment to an organization (or in our case , a
tse> profession) are even lower than before all the incentives were added on.

tse> Well, let me have it!  Prove me wrong every one out there!  I want to hear it
tse> loud and clear.  Thanks, Terrianne







tse> ********************

tse> Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, 
put the following text:

tse> unsubscribe OTlist

tse> ------

tse> OTnow messages are archived at:

tse> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
tse> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

tse> ********rC***********

********************

Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  In the message's body, put 
the following text:

unsubscribe OTlist

------

OTnow messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

********rC***********

Reply via email to