I have also felt this frustration for the past ten years. The statement made
that, "you can lead a horse to water...", I feel very appropriate. Most lay
people do care about the provision of therapy services when it is needed but
they don't want the details. Everything involved with therapy usually gets
placed into one "pile" of therapy... usually with the word Physical in front
of it. I feel that physical therapy has generally gotten better press over
the decades. PT self-validates themselves based on their research and their
ability to more closely associate themselves with physicians. (This is my own
opinion but I base it on many encounters).

Often, I find myself differentiating between OT and PT services to clients
and family. Unfortunately, the persons I talk to tend to hit the "delete"
button in their brains when the word occupation is mentioned. It is mundane
and does not seem to be as exciting or technical as counting to ten with
ankle weights or applying a tens unit. Most clients and family admit that
performing routine occupations is important but..."can my mom walk?"  Making
the connection of mobility with meaningful occupation is difficult to explain
to someone who just wants mom to walk. And everyone knows that is PT!!

However, when my message does get through, I usually end up with a very
strong proponent for OT, which makes my efforts worthwhile. It's  a great
feling.

Thanks,
Ed Myers, OTR/L

Reply via email to