Hi Ron  and others-

I've been lurking and decided to jump in with the mention of occupational 
deprivation, and your question Ron about assumptions with persons who cannot 
indicate they are truly  engaging in occupation.   This question almost brings 
occupation to a philosophical level.  If occupations are are defined as 
“activities …of everyday life, named, organized and given value and meaning by 
individuals and a culture” (Law, Polatajko, &Townsend, 1997, p. 32), then can 
we really ever know if a person is engaging in occupation  if they cannot tell 
us or somehow indicate the value of the engagement?  In my opinion, we cannot, 
and thats ok.  Sometimes the best we can offer our clients  who cannot tell us  
whether or not they value an activity as an occupation is an enjoyable 
experience that meets some physical or sensory need and  supports their overall 
wellbeing.  But I don't think we can call  this occupation.  According to the 
OT practice frame work,  while occupation is the goal and main
 modality of the OT, there is also room when appropriate for purposeful actives 
(ie, sorting silverware) if they enable participation in  other aspects of 
daily life.

Terrianne



Occupation is so subjective.  

Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Man,  you write at an advanced level!! I 
THINK I understand what you are
saying but if my response is way off base let me know.

Occupational  deprivation  is  a  common  age-associate malady. I see it
everyday  in  my  practice.  But,  IF  a  person  is unable to verbalize
(vocally  or  non-vocally) the meaning and worth of an engaged activity,
are we justified in assuming they are engaged in occupation?

I  understand  about  being  isolated. I work alone and have for several
years.  The  OTlist  is about the only place where I can freely exchange
ideas. I wish more subscribers would feel the same!

Ron



----- Original Message -----
From: Joan Riches 
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007
To:   [email protected] 
Subj: [OTlist] Sorting Silverware?

JR> Well - if occupation is what people do and occupation is idiosyncratic to
JR> the person, then meaning seems to have many different levels. People at this
JR> level certainly have emotions - and those emotions are often mitigated by a
JR> sense of doing. Certainly we need the concept of occupational deprivation to
JR> comprehend behaviour changes when opportunities 'to do' are provided.
JR> Thank you to you. The list has been such a source of professional
JR> connection.


-- 
Options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

**************************************************************************************
Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science for OTs 
Online. Gain the skills and credentials to propel your career.
www.otdegree.com/otn
**************************************************************************************


       
---------------------------------
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
 Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. 
-- 
Options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

**************************************************************************************
Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science for OTs 
Online. Gain the skills and credentials to propel your career.
www.otdegree.com/otn
**************************************************************************************

Reply via email to