On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 12:00 PM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 7/8/22 17:37, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 1:53 AM David Marchand <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:21 PM Gregory Rose <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     > > xenserver/openvswitch-xen.spec.in <
> http://openvswitch-xen.spec.in>
> >     >
> >     > This is a bit of an issue.  Does anyone even use xenserver anymore?
> >     > All of the documentation and build instructions are really old and
> >     > I wonder of they work anymore.   I have no xenserver  build
> environment
> >     > to  test  any changes.
> >
> >     Same for me.
> >
> >     Ben, Ilya, do you know if this xenserver packaging still has users?
> >     The last comment about it was in 2017.
> >     fefb757ce408 ("debian, xenserver: Update logrotate config to match
> RHEL.")
> >
> >     Should we keep on updating it? or can we simply drop support for
> >     xenserver packaging?
> >
> > I'd be inclined to drop it. I have heard so little about xenserver (or
> XCP, which
> > I think is its successor) over the last few years. It makes me a bit
> sad, since
> > that's where Open vSwitch started out (in a few cases I literally had to
> > disassemble bits of its binaries to understand what was going on), but
> the
> > world moves on.
>
> It seems like there is a newer open-source XCP-ng project that is
> more or less active.  There is also proprietary Citrix Hypervisor,
> of course.  Both seems to have OVS as a default networking solution
> and both seems to use some version of OVS 2.5.3.  Here is a repo
> for XCP-ng one:
>   https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/openvswitch
>
> They are not using our spec file though.  And have some custom
> patches on top.  Not sure about Citrix Hypervisor, but I found some
> more or less recent security hotfixes referencing openvswitch package
> like this one:
>
> https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX306423/hotfix-xs82e022-for-citrix-hypervisor-82
>
> So, yes, someone is still using it, but they are using about 5 year
> old version at this point and they are not using upstream spec file


I guess they're not really using anything we're working on now. I think
this still supports dropping it. I'm sure we'd welcome them back if they
asked.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to