Hey Ilya,
Ilya Maximets, May 24, 2023 at 17:05:
> I had a '+' because rss and lacp are two different entities and I looked
> at it as a mode of operation. i.e. RSS plus special handling for LACP.
> RSS looks strange in a comma-separated list, IMO.
For now, there is only LACP but if other protocols are added (e.g. BFD),
wouldn't it be weird to have them separated as well?
options:rx-steering=rss+lacp+bfd
Since lacp and bfd will most likely be put in the additional rxq, it
would make sense to identify them as a group.
I also have other reserves about specifying rss here after thinking some
more about it:
- rss shouldn't be disabled anyway, this forces users to always specify
it. This is not great from a usability point of view.
- When there is a single rxq configured by the user, there is no RSS
happening per-se since all other traffic will be put in a single
queue. The additional rxq being reserved for lacp and/or other special
traffic.
What do you think about removing "rss" altogether from the items?
options:rx-steering=lacp,bfd,...
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
