The only places I've ever heard of Blazor being used is <something>.
microsoft.com and this mailing list.

We do Angular exclusively and see a lot of it in the wild from other dev at
our client sites.



On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 12:30, DotNet Dude via ozdotnet <
ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> wrote:

> I find it very hard to believe Blazor demand has overtaken JS. That’s an
> insane comment from Adam
>
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 at 12:05, Greg Keogh via ozdotnet <
> ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone here actively using Blazor on a decent sized project? I used it
>>> for a while on my last contract but am unable to find new work anywhere
>>> that uses Blazor, not a single one!
>>
>>
>> Compared to server-side ASP.NET and JS Frameworks, Blazor is a gift from
>> heaven .. well ... sort-of. Here's a Friday story.
>>
>> With the death of Silverlight, we had to replace an app with a quite rich
>> UI with something else, what?! Like many people, I was spitting chips angry
>> at the suggestion we must replace our Silverlight apps with HTML5 apps. The
>> idea that HTML+CSS+JS could replace a WPF-like rich web UI made me laugh
>> and cry at the same time.
>>
>> Angular was really popular around 2018 so we got an offer to write a JS
>> replacement for $200/hr. I then decided to learn Angular and watched 5
>> hours of a 10 hour Angular course, at which point I gave up and said f**k
>> that s**t. Now what?
>>
>> Luckily, Blazor 0.9 was in preview around this time. I spent a whole
>> Sunday afternoon experimenting with Blazor. By the end of the day I had
>> quite a sophisticated hobby app working with only a few hundred lines of
>> coding, thanks to the familiarity of using VS, C# and Razor markup (with a
>> bit of JS). The same app in ASP.NET would have taken 5 times as long and
>> 5 times the code. The same app in Angular would have required unfamiliar
>> tooling and millions of lines of script.
>>
>> To answer your question, I have one quite complex Blazor app being used
>> by some huge US companies to analyse marketing data (using Telerik and
>> SpreadJS components to attempt to make charts and grids as fancy as was
>> possible in Silverlight). I have a couple of smaller apps in live use, and
>> few little ones for utility use.
>>
>> I know the guys at Melbourne App Development
>> <https://melbourneappdevelopment.com/> are really keen on Blazor and
>> were using it for some serious apps just as it reached version 1.0. About
>> 18 months ago, Adam Cogan at SSW said during the preamble to one of their
>> monthly presentations, that Blazor demand had overtaken JS.
>>
>> I hope other people in here have similar stories.
>>
>> I must end on a sad note. ASP.NET, Blazor, JS, or whatever, all
>> finish-up rendering in a web browser. It's tragic that the ancient dumb web
>> browser is now the only host for web apps, and that we must attempt to
>> present serious business applications using HTML, CSS and JS. The web
>> browser was invented so we could have flame wars and look at pictures of
>> cats and porn, it's barely evolved since then and it's completely
>> inadequate for rendering business applications. Sure it can, but look at
>> the flaming hoops and all the weird quirks you have to jump through. Web
>> development is in a lamentable state.
>>
>> *Greg Keogh*
>> --
>> ozdotnet mailing list
>> To manage your subscription, access archives:
>> https://codify.mailman3.com/
>
> --
> ozdotnet mailing list
> To manage your subscription, access archives: https://codify.mailman3.com/
-- 
ozdotnet mailing list 
To manage your subscription, access archives: https://codify.mailman3.com/ 

Reply via email to