ozdotnet  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: free azure configuration Greg Keogh
• Friendly URL for intranet apps Tom P
  • Re: Friendly URL for intranet apps DotNet Dude
  • Re: Friendly URL for intranet apps Tom P
  • Re: Friendly URL for intranet apps David Rhys Jones
  • RE: Friendly URL for intranet apps Ken Schaefer
  • Re: Friendly URL for intranet apps Tom P
  • RE: Friendly URL for intranet apps Ken Schaefer
• GitHub API authentication Greg Keogh
  • Re: GitHub API authentication Stephen Price
  • Re: GitHub API authentication Greg Keogh
  • Re: GitHub API authentication Greg Keogh
  • Re: GitHub API authentication Stephen Price
  • Re: GitHub API authentication Greg Keogh
• [OT] GitHub busy? Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] GitHub busy? Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] GitHub busy? DotNet Dude
  • Re: [OT] GitHub busy? mike smith
• [OT] Load testing web app Tom Rutter
  • Re: [OT] Load testing web app Tony McGee
  • Re: [OT] Load testing web app Michael Ridland
• [OT] github "downloads" Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" David Connors
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Piers Williams
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Stephen Price
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Stephen Price
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" kirsten greed
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Stephen Price
  • Re: [OT] github "downloads" Piers Williams
• Versioning Solutions Glen Harvy
  • Re: Versioning Solutions mike smith
  • Re: Versioning Solutions DotNet Dude
  • Re: Versioning Solutions Glen Harvy
  • Re: Versioning Solutions Glen Harvy
• Anyone using Stripe? Greg Keogh
• JSON deserialize Tom P
  • Re: JSON deserialize Greg Keogh
  • Re: JSON deserialize djones147
  • Re: JSON deserialize Tom P
  • Re: JSON deserialize Nathan Schultz
  • Re: JSON deserialize Greg Keogh
  • Re: JSON deserialize DotNet Dude
  • Re: JSON deserialize Grant Maw
  • Re: JSON deserialize Greg Keogh
  • Re: JSON deserialize David Rhys Jones
• Distributing Azure apps Greg Keogh
  • Re: Distributing Azure apps Tom P
  • Re: Distributing Azure apps DotNet Dude
  • Re: Distributing Azure apps Greg Keogh
  • RE: Distributing Azure apps greg
  • Re: Distributing Azure apps Greg Keogh
  • Re: Distributing Azure apps Donald
  • Re: Distributing Azure apps Tony McGee
• 3 x senior .net developers needed Tom Gao
  • Re: 3 x senior .net developers needed David Burstin
  • Re: 3 x senior .net developers needed Tom Rutter
  • Re: 3 x senior .net developers needed Tom Gao
  • Re: 3 x senior .net developers needed Tom Rutter
  • Re: 3 x senior .net developers needed DotNet Dude
  • Re: 3 x senior .net developers needed mike smith
  • RE: 3 x senior .net developers needed Gordon Jones
• [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Stephen Price
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Stephen Price
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Stephen Price
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Greg Low
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll DotNet Dude
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll Greg Low
  • Re: [OT] Contracting advice for payroll DotNet Dude
• Graph visualisation Greg Keogh
  • Re: Graph visualisation steven
• .NET Core or .NET Framework Tom Rutter
  • Re: .NET Core or .NET Framework glen
  • Re: .NET Core or .NET Framework DotNet Dude
  • Re: .NET Core or .NET Framework Nathan Schultz
• [Off Topic] Drop Box alternatives with a large number of files (about 0.5M+ files). Greg Harris
  • Re: [Off Topic] Drop Box alternatives with a large number of files (about 0.5M+ files). David Rhys Jones
  • Re: [Off Topic] Drop Box alternatives with a large number of files (about 0.5M+ files). mike smith
  • Re: [Off Topic] Drop Box alternatives with a large number of files (aboutt0.5M+ files). Stephen Price
  • RE: [Off Topic] Drop Box alternatives with a large number of files (about 0.5M+ files). Iain Carlin
• NUC Grant Maw
  • Re: NUC Alan Ingleby
  • Re: NUC Stephen Price
  • Re: NUC Grant Maw
  • RE: NUC eddie.debear
  • RE: NUC Ken Schaefer
• [OT] New job Tom P
  • Re: [OT] New job Steven Parish
  • Re: [OT] New job Tom P
  • Re: [OT] New job DotNet Dude
  • Re: [OT] New job Greg Low
  • Re: [OT] New job Tom Rutter
  • Re: [OT] New job mike smith
  • Re: [OT] New job Tom P
  • Re: [OT] New job Steven Parish
  • Re: [OT] New job Grant Maw
  • Re: [OT] New job Tom Rutter
  • Re: [OT] New job Arjang Assadi
  • Re: [OT] New job Grant Maw
  • Re: [OT] New job Tom Rutter
  • Re: [OT] New job David Gardiner
  • Re: [OT] New job Tom P
• Finding DB change source Craig vN
  • Re: Finding DB change source David Gardiner
  • RE: Finding DB change source greg
  • Re: Finding DB change source Craig vN
  • Re: Finding DB change source Craig vN
• Cosmos DB Graph API Greg Keogh
• Async Await. David Rhys Jones
  • Re: Async Await. Greg Keogh
  • Re: Async Await. Preet Sangha
  • Re: Async Await. David Rhys Jones
  • Re: Async Await. David Gardiner
  • Re: Async Await. David Rhys Jones
  • Re: Async Await. Greg Keogh
  • Re: Async Await. David Rhys Jones
  • Re: Async Await. David Gardiner
• Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Preet Sangha
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Alan Ingleby
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Preet Sangha
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine mike smith
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Greg Keogh
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Preet Sangha
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine mike smith
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Preet Sangha
  • Re: Slightly off topic - Pros and con of moving to an Apple machine Mossyblog
• [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • RE: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention greg
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • RE: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention greg
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • RE: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention greg
  • RE: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention greg
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Greg Low
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Greg Low
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Greg Low
  • RE: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention greg
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • RE: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention greg
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention David Rhys Jones
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
  • Re: [OT] Sql Server writes causing contention Tom P
• Windows store submission Greg Keogh
• [OT] 5G Tom Rutter
  • Re: [OT] 5G mike smith
  • Re: [OT] 5G David Connors
  • Re: [OT] 5G David Rhys Jones
• Publish UWP to store? Greg Keogh
  • Re: Publish UWP to store? kirsten greed
• Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit Tom P
  • RE: Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit David Kean
  • Re: Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit Greg Keogh
  • Re: Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit Tom P
  • Re: Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit Greg Keogh
  • Re: Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit Alan Ingleby
  • Re: Legacy Asp.net application change from 32bit to 64bit Piers Williams
• [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting Tom P
  • Re: [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting David Burstin
  • Re: [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting Tony McGee
  • Re: [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting Nathan Schultz
  • Re: [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting David Burstin
  • Re: [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting Preet Sangha
  • RE: [OT] SQL Server DB designed for reporting greg
• Blazor comments Greg Keogh
  • Re: Blazor comments Arjang Assadi
  • Re: Blazor comments David Rhys Jones
  • Re: Blazor comments Greg Low
  • Re: Blazor comments Greg Keogh
  • RE: Blazor comments David Kean
  • Re: Blazor comments Jamie Surman
  • Re: Blazor comments Craig vN
  • Re: Blazor comments Greg Keogh
  • Re: Blazor comments DotNet Dude
  • Re: Blazor comments Piers Williams
  • Re: Blazor comments Greg Harris
  • Re: Blazor comments Stephen Price
  • Re: Blazor comments Greg Keogh
• [OT] C++ language war Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] C++ language war mike smith
  • Re: [OT] C++ language war Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] C++ language war Nathan Schultz
• [Possibly OT] Job scheduler from Sql Server Tom P
  • Re: [Possibly OT] Job scheduler from Sql Server Tony McGee
  • Re: [Possibly OT] Job scheduler from Sql Server Tony Wright
  • RE: [Possibly OT] Job scheduler from Sql Server Greg Low
  • Re: [Possibly OT] Job scheduler from Sql Server Tom P
• [OT] Server 2008 R2 to 2019 Greg Keogh
  • Re: [OT] Server 2008 R2 to 2019 Preet Sangha
  • Re: [OT] Server 2008 R2 to 2019 DotNet Dude

• Earlier messages
• Later messages