Dear Lynn
Do you have a reference in regard to your perception /understanding of
manipulative language (? & behoviours)
That would help others of us not only become but learn how to tell with
thius??
Denise
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lynne Staff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] repeat cs candidates


> Hi Jo
> You have hit on a really interesting point here - what Jocelyn  Lawler
calls
> "Minifisms". These are words or statements people use to downplay or
> minimise something - draw their attention in another direction. Examples
are
> 'I am just going to have a little feel' (where we minimise the discomfort
or
> the procedure of VE), or to use your scenario, Jo...'the baby might have
to
> spend a bit of time on the nursery, because sometimes they need to work a
> bit hard to breathe, after they have been born by caesarean', or 'it is
much
> better, we use dissolvable stitches - much more comfortable than staples'
or
> (in the case of forceps/ventouse) "we need to give your baby a bit of help
> to come out"
>
> It's a different story when people talk about vaginal birth after
> caesarean - no minifisms there! We pack our language with terms that are
> VERY explicit in their message - trial of scar/trial of labour for
example.
> I don't think there is such a term as "maxifisms", but I am sure we could
> coin it and come up with some beauties (along with the ones that already
> exist)! Yet, when discussing a planned caesarean, to get back to
minifisms,
> you might hear "the doctor said the scar would be virtually invisible, and
> quite small - I imagined it would be much bigger than he said it would be"
>
>
> I was at antenatal class the other week, sitting on the floor in the
middle
> of all the couples, with an epidural set, catheter, and IV set spread out
in
> front of me, going through step by step the procedure of having one
> inserted, and what having an epidural entails. We also discussed the
> possible consequences of having an epidural (the anaesthetists at the unit
> where I work send out an infosheet to women which they have to sign that
> they have read, discussed with their obstetrician/midwife, and that they
> understand what is involved before they come to hospital - it lists the
> adverse outcomes which may be associated with epidurals and the sheet
> provides a great beginning point for discussions about it).
>
> ANYWAY, back to the story, the way that epidurals are discussed in general
I
> think,  has to be the greatest example of a minifism EVER! Women and their
> partners will say - "I never imagined it was so involved" (having an
> epidural), or "I jst thought I would have one if things got too bad", or -
a
> classic comment here - "I never realised that this was such a big decision
> to make - that so much could ride on this, or that it could have such an
> effect on my labour! I thought having an epidural was a simple thing!"
>
> Mind you caesarean birth is coming up a close second in the minifsm
race....
> Just  venting.....
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jo & Dean Bainbridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 6:20 PM
> Subject: [ozmidwifery] repeat cs candidates
>
>
> > I come across a number of women whom have had more than one cs and when
I
> > talk to them about the risks of repeat cs, the ones who don't go off mad
> at
> > me for bringing it up, say that their concerns are for the babies safety
> > only.  I find this incredible that they firmly believe that a cs is
safer
> > for child.  When I ask about respiratory disorder and so on, their
> response
> > is that they would prefer baby to be in a nursery for a few hours for
> > monitoring for breathing problems rather than neo-natal intensive care
> unit
> > for weeks/ months with brain damage.  They seriously believe that an
event
> > like that is common with vaginal births!  Mind you, if you look at our
> > Australian society's attitude towards birth being fraught with danger,
it
> is
> > easy to understand how these women think that it is true.
> > When asked about the risks to themselves, they say things such as "I am
> only
> > having one/two child/ren anyway"  or they would prefer to have a cut on
> > their tummies rather than a huge tear from their vaginas to their
> > anus....again skewed view points showing through.  (I usually say "well
I
> > can tell you 19 staples in the tummy hurts like hell"  "what do you mean
> > staples???"  but now it is a dissolvable stich in many cases so it is
even
> > more trivialised by some care providers)
> > Not really saying anything you guys haven't already heard but just
thought
> I
> > would put the anecdotal information that I have come across with CARES.
> >
> > How many hospitals have a cs antenatal class?
> >
> > How many have VBAC classes?
> >
> > I have had a discussion with Marc Keirse (effective care)  about
> introducing
> > VBAC models of care (in the form of VBAC clinics eg)  however his first
> > thoughts were that it would marginalise VBAC. But my retort was that we
> are
> > already marginalised as high risk (no birth centre, continuous
monitoring
> > time restrictions etc) but if we were cared for by educated supportive
and
> > caring care providers who focus on our 99.7% chance of our scar
rupturing
> > and not the 0.3% that it could, then being marginalised would be a good
> > thing.
> > Any thoughts on this suggestion?
> >
> > Jo Bainbridge
> > founding member CARES SA
> > www.cares-sa.org.au
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > phone: 08 8388 6918
> > birth with trust, faith & love...
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lois Wattis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:14 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] risks of 4th c/s and support for artificial
> > feeding
> >
> >
> > > Dear Lynne and others on this subject
> > > I agree this information needs to be given to women antenatally in
> > whatever
> > > location they can be accessed.  Problem is, women planning C.S. for
> > whatever
> > > reason frequently don't attend any antenatal education because they
> > consider
> > > they do not need it (not planning labour), so they are missed.  Their
> > total
> > > exposure to 'education' is what they get from the ob (!!!)  usually
> scant
> > at
> > > best.
> > >
> > > Another common situation is that they are not 'planning' another
> pregnancy
> > > so discount the potential consequences abnormal placental implantation
> in
> > a
> > > subsequent pregnancy.  We all know some pregnancies occur -
> unplanned....
> > > Women tend to hear what they want to, and discount the info they feel
> does
> > > not apply to them.  I also find they (elective C.S. candidates) often
> know
> > > NOTHING of the potential risk for endometrial problems related to
their
> > > scarred uterus.... another subject infrequently discussed in the "ob.
> > > education" process.  Unfortunately, so many of the elective C.S. women
> are
> > > NOT making truly informed choices.    (sigh)   Lois
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Lynne Staff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 6:53 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] risks of 4th c/s and support for artificial
> > > feeding
> > >
> > >
> > > The potential for placental problems  does not seem to be discussed
with
> > > women when they are booking in for repeat caesareans. When I speak
with
> > > women who are having elective repeat caesareans, they seem unaware
that
> > this
> > > may be a consequence of this choice. As a result of this, this
> information
> > > is included in antenatal classes when discussing caesarean birth and
> also
> > in
> > > the VBAC and caesarean class.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 1:33 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] risks of 4th c/s and support for artificial
> > > feeding
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Sarah: I just wanted to add a note about the increased risks of
> > > placenta
> > > > previa, accreta, and percreta which are real risks to a populatiuon
of
> > > women
> > > > who have had prior cesarean birth(s). However they really don't tell
> us
> > > > anything about this woman's actual risk. If she has had problems
with
> > > > removal of the placenta after her previous cesareans then maybe this
> can
> > > be
> > > > checked out with u/s as this would tell us valuable info. We had a
mum
> > in
> > > > for an elective repeat caesar the other week who had a known
placenta
> > > > percreta (had been checked by u/s as having not grown through to the
> > > > bladder). There were extensive precautions taken to avoid an
obstetric
> > > > disaster and they did. I think the risk of women having these
> placental
> > > > problems after c/s is a bit like women's risk of developing kelloid
> > > growths
> > > > after ear piercings: some of us will never develop them (0% actual
> risk)
> > > and
> > > > others will always develop them (100% actual risk), but we don't
know
> an
> > > > individuals actual response until after the event, so all we can
give
> is
> > a
> > > > population risk.
> > > >
> > > > I think an outcome of the increasing number of caesars occuring
right
> > now
> > > is
> > > > this increased risk of retained placentas (accretas etc..) due to
> > uterine
> > > > scarring. Since we have not done this before I think we simply don't
> > know
> > > > what the risks of this particular outcome occuring will be.
> > > >
> > > > marilyn
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Lynne Staff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 1:16 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] risks of 4th c/s and support for
artificial
> > > > feeding
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Sarah - has she considered labouring and giving birth?
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "sarah.darling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: "Ozmidwifery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:03 PM
> > > > > Subject: [ozmidwifery] risks of 4th c/s and support for artificial
> > > feeding
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Recent new subscriber here. I'm a community midwife in England
and
> > am
> > > > > really
> > > > > > struggling to find research on the risks of a 4th c/s as opposed
> to
> > > any
> > > > > > other number c/s (i.e. what are the increased risks of a 4th
c/s,
> if
> > > > any,
> > > > > so
> > > > > > that one of 'our' women can make a decision whether to try for a
> 4th
> > > > baby
> > > > > as
> > > > > > she has been told that 4 x c/s is 'too dangerous' - her quote).
> Also
> > > > does
> > > > > > anyone know of any research asking women whether, if they chose
to
> > > > > > artificially feed their baby, they received support/teaching in
> > making
> > > > up
> > > > > > feeds, etc., singly or in groups. This is for a senior student
and
> > her
> > > > > > dissertation. Really enjoying all the wisdom out there! Best
> wishes
> > > > > > Sarah Darling
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Community midwife
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > > > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or
unsubscribe.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> > >
> > > --
> > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> > >
> > > --
> > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
>
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to