|
Dear Denise,
In response to your questions on the 19th March - I
have been pondering, and hoping someone else would start the discussion - I find
the whole area of classifying degrees of shoulder dystocia very
hazy.
It is very subjective, and the skill and experience
of the midwife makes a big difference.
I think there is a reluctance to classify mild
shoulder dystocia as dystocia at all - because of the potential negative impact
that this might have on future births - ie elective CS.
I think the moderate - severe shoulder dystocias
are easier to label - because there is invariably some compromise or
injury to the baby, which kind of "justifies" the label, and any
management of future births.
I guess I also use the condition of the baby as a
guide - if I am caring for a woman whose previous birth notes say she had a
moderate shoulder dystocia, but the baby had good Apgars, etc, I'd be inclined
to believe that it was only mild.
I don't know of any specific definitions or
boundaries to classify degrees of dystocia.
Jacky
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite Breast Belinda Maier
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite Breast Veronica
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite Bre... Sandy Cochrane
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite... Veronica
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favou... Sandy Cochrane
- Re: [ozmidwifery] ... Andrea Quanchi
- Re: [ozmidwife... Sandy Cochrane
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite Breast Denise Hynd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite Bre... barbara glare & chris bright
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Favourite... Denise Hynd
- Ross W Timbs
