"Any suggestions. Should all women have a follow up appointment with the
midwife who was at her birth, is this appropriate as they may have been part of
the problem, should all women have a follow up appointment but the woman be
allowed to choose who she wants the appointment with, at what stage would this
be appropriate, 2 weeks, 8 weeks 3 months? How does this fit with the M&CH
nurses who are now involved in the woman's on going care? How does her doctor,
be it her own GP, obst or the one who attended (or not) her birth be
involved in this? "
Andrea these are definitely on
track about post-trauma, but how about measures to prevent the
trauma in the first place? PTSD is not inevitable as I've seen women
experience very traumatic births either through staff mishandling or purely "no
fault" as it were, stuff that just goes wrong but through the intervention of
JUST ONE kind, loving staff member, the woman has suffered no lasting ill
effects. It would also require so many changes of mindset on the part of those
CPs too. People believe that birth is traumatic in itself and that drugs and
interventions improve, not detract from, the experience. This is not the case
for most women who had no need of those interventions in the first place. Real
debriefing can only occur in a place with no vested interest in the outcome.
Hospitals are keen to avoid what they see as potential lititgation and will
refuse to listen to emotional pain as valid. I have a close friend who has
written proof in her records of serious mistakes, outright lies, really shocking
stuff that has left her gutted for years. She tried desparately to talk to the
hospital but despite the lies being in black and white in her record the only
response has been total denial, we were right, we know what we're doing, you're
wrong. She had a barely qualified surgeon perform surgery she neither needed nor
consented to, and he left a large chunk of placenta behind. Of course the
massive infection was treated as malingering until she got a private u/s and had
it confirmed. Hospital response? No, we didn't do that. It must be something
else. She now has a lifelong battle with horrible scarring from the crap job
that was done and the resulting infection, as well as chronic systemic candida
from the months and months of antibs required. This was her second unnecessary
surgery but most people around her, medical people included, view her as
fortunate to have access to western medical care. Her ideal birth now is under a
tree a long way from such care. She said no to the caesarean, she told every
person she saw in the hospital that she didn't consent, she ran outside and
smoked compulsively hoping this would stop her being given an epidural (which
incidentally didn't work so she felt the whole surgery, something else the
hospital deny happened. Hard to think she'd imagine that.). When she tried to
talk about how traumatised she is, she was told that it was just leftover trauma
from her first caesarean and nothing to do with all these factors. She
also had her baby taken to SCN and didn't meet him for 24 hours later by which
time he'd been ff with thickened formula without her consent for perceived
reflux. Major Melbourne hospital.
What we REALLY need is to
prevent it in the first place. How can we do this? Well I offered to talk to
students in the hospital where my birthrape occurred but have never been taken
up on it. I'mnot really surprised even though my offer was entirely
genuine.
We need to impress upon those
involved in care that "informed consent" does not mean massaging the truth,
telling outright lies, manipulating women "You want the best for your baby don't
you? Take this drug."
We need NO to mean no, so that
when a woman says no she is respected. I'm not sure that all the people who see
vaginas every day for a living necessarily respect the sanctity of women's
bodies. I certainly received no respect for my body in my hospital experience.
If a woman screams when you
touch her, STOP TOUCHING HER. Leave the room if you've scared her, make sure
someone else takes over from you. Apologise as soon as possible.
Just a few quick hints but I
can provide a lot more.
We also only have funding and
recognition of PND in this country. PND is a great diagnosis which puts all the
blame on the defective woman and recognises no possibility that she may actually
have PTSD. I've spoken to numerous PND support groups, and women who attend
them, and most are rubbish. There is no discussion of birth although most of the
women are traumatised by their experience or at the very least require intensive
debriefing. Most of them involve exhortations to get more sleep, generally by
weaning and ff, and do nice things for yourself. Wildly inappropriate and
unhelpful. When I was suicidal from PTSD I saw my GP who insisted on booking me
into a PND unit. I kept repeating over and over that I didn't have PND. He
ignored me. I just cancelled the appt later. He also tried to tell me that there
were positives about my experience. What were they? I was alive and so was my
baby. Well, I expected that from a major tertiary hospital and a baby never in
distress in utero so why should I be grateful for it? Do they normally kill
women? (Ok facetious, but do you know what I mean?)
To diagnose or recognise PTSD
requires that our hospital system faces up to the conveyor belt happening within
it. PTSD implies that something was done to that woman in some way which has led
to this. It puts the focus back on the perpetrator rather than the victim. This
to me, is the biggest reason it doesn't happen. It also, in the minds of those
legal persons on hospital boards, and insurance companies, opens up more places
for women to sue. Given that most claims paid out against Obs are for emotional
distress, by a very long shot, this is already happening.
I have also seen, and had
expressed to me about my own experience, a perception that only previously
damaged or traumatised women experience PTSD from birth. Again, let's blame the
victim. Actually what happens to many women in hospitals is quite sufficient to
cause massive PTSD after which we are then expected to go home grateful for our
live baby even when what occurred was purely iatrogenic. For the record, I have
never experienced child sexual asault but have had PTSD previously from an
attempted rape in my 20s. Recovery was a lot easier however as no one told
me to get over it and be grateful and I didn't have to care for another person
at the same time. It was a societally sanctioned way to be traumatised. If
we recontextualise what happens in birth, and put it outside of an institution,
we might begin to reclaim come of our natural horror.
Picture this, you're walking
along the street, someone comes up to you and without warning cuts open your
vagina. Horrible right? Happens regularly in hospitals but because the
perpetrator wears a gown and is invested with power in that setting, it's
considered ok. No warning, no anaesthetic, no need, common hospital
scenario.
You're in your home and
someone is coming at you with a loaded syringe. You scream "Get away from me
with that. What's in that?" They ignore you and jab you with it repeatedly over
many hours. It makes you nauseous, dizzy, unable to think properly. During this
time, the perpetrator asks you to make major life decisions all the while
telling you your children are in danger. Could you do that?
You're lying paralysed in your
bed, in the next room you can hear your baby screaming as unknown people do
things to it about which you have no knowledge. What do you do? Eventually
someone hands you a baby you've never seen, wrapped up in a blanket. What do you
do? Do you take their word for it that the baby is yours?
These are entirely preventable
and the scars they leave on women can last a lifetime. In the complaint letter I
wrote to the hospital, I rewrote the scenarios I had experienced in an effort to
give them an idea of how it ought to go. Instead of unnamed person who doesn't
introduce themselves sticking a gloved hand inside my body and then announcing a
course of action over my head while I scream, and with no prior discussion about
the ramifications of those actions, how about a conversation first? Introduce
yourself, look the CLIENT in the eye, talk about wanting to do a VE, talk about
why, talk about how, talk about how she can say no at any time and to tell the
CP if it hurts so they can help. Talk about possible courses of action if
certain signs are present, talk about what those might mean. Ok in a true
emergency this becomes more complex but in most cases it's not that urgent. This
can still be done by a CP whom you have never met, and occur with a client
never seen before.
And please please please, read
some birth stories! Even a quick perusal of several stories is going to show you
the same thing - women being treated like cadavers. There are research
articles and books on birth trauma which all spell out the same thing. Having my
baby is not a day at the office for me, please don't treat it like that. My body
is sacrosanct, not to be handled harshly, not to be on view to those passing by.
I can't tell you how many women have onlookers not needed when they're trying to
push out a baby. Given how poor our midwife/client ratio is this always astounds
me but it's sundry people passing who might like a look at this "case" who get
invited in.
Many on this list are
nonposting members of Joyous Birth and therefore have access to the birth
stories section of our forums. Please read those stories, note how women
describe what it's like to be last in the hierarchy, even behind your baby.
There are countless birth trauma groups springing up around the world, all led
and run by consumers with almost no input from the institutions where the trauma
occurs. As a previous poster said, this is all too closely allied with the
rampant sexism of the western world anyway so I for one, don't expect it to be
much different from this. But for many of us, the perpetrators of our trauma are
other women and that is very sad. I don't understand how the women who did what
they did to me, can live with themselves. This isn't about obstetrics being a
boys' club, it's about a whole system which does this to the consumer. Consumer,
not patient!
This is a list of resources
online that are helpful. Please ask for more. Please read with an open heart,
hear the stories without feeling attacked personally.
Support,
Advocacy and Recovery on the internet http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/accessingartemis A
group for women recovering from birth trauma. Loads
of useful links. Includes info on recovering from traumatic birth. Very
empowering. Encouraging of a consumer-type attitude to your health
care. http://www.victoriousbirth.com/index.html Caesarean
and Traumatic Birth Support. A site for women who want to truly heal spiritually
and emotionally after a difficult birth experience http://www.eheart.com/cesarean/index.html A
site by, for and about those born by c-sec. New
Zealand site on traumatic birth and recovery – PTSD and
PND. http://www.sheilakitzinger.com/Birth%20Crisis.htm Kitzinger
on birth trauma. http://www.birthlove.com/petition/womens_rights.html Petition
and declaration on the rights of birthing women. A
http://www.yoni.com/healerf/templedoor.shtml Healing
the |
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Judy Chapman
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support pinky mckay
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Nicole Carver
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Mary Murphy
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Dean & Jo
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Judy Chapman
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Janet Fraser
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Janet Fraser
- [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] fear Ceri & Katrina
- Re: [ozmidwifery] fear Honey Acharya
- RE: [ozmidwifery] fear Lieve Huybrechts
- Re: [ozmidwifery] fear Jo Watson
- Re: [ozmidwifery] fear Gloria Lemay
- Re: [ozmidwifery] fear Judy Chapman
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Honey Acharya
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Post cs support Kate Reynolds