Wow. You mean, "the right tool for the right job" still applies? *feigned shocked look*
I've been saying Silverlight is for Apps and HTML is for sites for ages. Nothing changed here. Should be interesting how they clarify the statement. :) On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Madero <[email protected]> wrote: > I like how Shawn puts it, >> >> Silverlight is good for Apps; HTML is good for sites. > > That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases for > Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not much > different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), other > devices (maybe?). > > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stovell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ...at least for non-phones: >> http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/ >> >> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834 >> http://wildermuth.com/2010/10/30/Post-PDC_HTML5_v_Silverlight_Debate >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> ozsilverlight mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight >> > > > > -- > Miguel A. Madero Reyes > www.miguelmadero.com (blog) > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > ozsilverlight mailing list > [email protected] > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
