Hah! Yes, I should have put Mobile there. Please don't take that graph as being anything more than my way of informing this discussion that there are many different dimensions to view things through. I also left regular expressions off of that graph, which I apologize to the gods of System.Text for.
Darren [email protected] Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:04:00 +1000 Subject: Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet? From: [email protected] To: [email protected] I notice "Mobile" is missing from your graph. What are you telling us Darren? :) On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Darren Neimke <[email protected]> wrote: As I just posted on Paul's blog, maybe it's all a matter of perspective? Seems logical that within a Silverlight technical group like this that you'd focus on things down at that level of detail. From a different perspective you could easily see a lack of focus on any of these technologies? Here's the type of view I mean: http://twitpic.com/32us7s Darren [email protected] From: [email protected] Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:34:52 +1100 Subject: Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet? To: [email protected] Nice post. But I'm not sure MS is pushing that much (or even that little) for WPF internally or externally. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Paul Stovell <[email protected]> wrote: I took the liberty of graphing this: http://www.paulstovell.com/tool-for-the-job On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Price <[email protected]> wrote: Wow. You mean, "the right tool for the right job" still applies? *feigned shocked look* I've been saying Silverlight is for Apps and HTML is for sites for ages. Nothing changed here. Should be interesting how they clarify the statement. :) On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Madero <[email protected]> wrote: > I like how Shawn puts it, >> >> Silverlight is good for Apps; HTML is good for sites. > > That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases for > Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not much > different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), other > devices (maybe?). > > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stovell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ...at least for non-phones: >> http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/ >> >> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834 >> http://wildermuth.com/2010/10/30/Post-PDC_HTML5_v_Silverlight_Debate >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> ozsilverlight mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight >> > > > > -- > Miguel A. Madero Reyes > www.miguelmadero.com (blog) > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > ozsilverlight mailing list > [email protected] > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight -- Paul Stovell _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight -- Miguel A. Madero Reyes www.miguelmadero.com (blog) [email protected] _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight -- Paul Stovell _______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
_______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
