I took the liberty of graphing this: http://www.paulstovell.com/tool-for-the-job
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Price <[email protected]>wrote: > Wow. You mean, "the right tool for the right job" still applies? > *feigned shocked look* > > I've been saying Silverlight is for Apps and HTML is for sites for > ages. Nothing changed here. > > Should be interesting how they clarify the statement. :) > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Madero <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like how Shawn puts it, > >> > >> Silverlight is good for Apps; HTML is good for sites. > > > > That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases > for > > Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not > much > > different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), other > > devices (maybe?). > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Stovell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> ...at least for non-phones: > >> http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/ > >> > >> > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834 > >> http://wildermuth.com/2010/10/30/Post-PDC_HTML5_v_Silverlight_Debate > >> Paul > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ozsilverlight mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Miguel A. Madero Reyes > > www.miguelmadero.com (blog) > > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ozsilverlight mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ozsilverlight mailing list > [email protected] > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > -- Paul Stovell
_______________________________________________ ozsilverlight mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight
