I am wondering about the strategy of merging everything
into one mega-document.  Seems like there might be
advantages to putting modules in different documents.
For example I could see P2PP as a piece that could
stand alone.

John

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dean Willis wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 14, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> >
> >> The authors of RELOAD are well-known persons in the IETF; I have no
> >> doubt that they would work through the technical issues raised within
> >> the working group pretty quickly.
> >
> > Neither do I; but we cannot allow the perception that their standing
> > allows their relatively immature draft to squelch ostensibly more
> > mature drafts from participants who are newer to the IETF. All
> > participants must be held to equitable standards. To do otherwise
> > would reinforce the "secret handshake" reputation that has plagued the
> > IETF for many years.
> >
> I certainly understand that.
>
> I have to note, however, that based on my past IETF work the initial
> proposal (regardless of how mature it looked like) was substantially
> changed afterwards and a significant amount of work was done as part of
> the working group process even though some folks believed that their
> document is already 80% finished at the time when it was submitted as a
> working group item. This probably reflect the 80:20 rule.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> > --
>
> > Dean
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
>
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to