On Mar 20, 2008, at 3:48 AM, Enrico Marocco wrote: > Cullen Jennings wrote: >> Henry, I don't know what I can do to convince you I am not lying. I >> have said many times that there are other open source implementations >> of P2P SIP proposals in addition to the fine work from Columbia. >> Cisco >> has open source one that I have helped with. You can get it yourself >> from the b-20070702-p2p branch of the resiprocate.org site. Or browse >> the code at >> http://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/resiprocate/branches/b-20070702-p2p/ >> . It is under a BSD like license. This was provided as open source >> for the general public on September 17, 2007 which I suspect was >> actually before any others were publicly available. I announced that >> this existed at the microphone in one of the p2psip adhocs. I have >> told you this several times in person. It upsets me when you say this >> does not exist. I really don't know what to say. > > For some reasons I don't undestand, people tend to forget about > projects > they are not directly involved in. Guess what, we have had the SIPDHT > project running on sourceforge since May '05, providing firstly a > working implementation of initial David's drafts and then, from July > '07, a full implementation of XPP and XPP-PCAN; no matter how many > times > we have pointed it out, during live meetings and on this list too, > people keep ignoring it. But, Cullen, please, don't get upset: I'm > sure > they are not lying, they are just "forgetting". > > -- > Ciao, > Enrico
Makes sense and a good perspective. I'll go with that explanation - I certainly like it better than the alternative explanations. Now, if only we could have a web page that pointed at all of the work :-) Thanks, Cullen _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
