David,
Are you expecting us to send messages to the list agreeing with this?
Or are you taking the lack of *dissenting* messages as a sign of
consensus?
Dan
P.S. I agree with this action, by the way, and did hum to adopt in the
room in Minneapolis.
On Dec 26, 2008, at 10:08 AM, David A. Bryan wrote:
In Minneapolis, there was a hum taken which indicated rough consensus
to move towards adopting the P2PSIP diagnostics draft as a working
group item. Since there were also a number of corrections/changes
requested, the chairs asked the authors to iterate the draft and post
it, and then we would verify the consensus on list.
The authors posted the revisions to the draft a few weeks ago:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-04.txt
I'd like to ask for list consensus to verify the consensus from the
meeting in favor of adopting this work as a WG item.
David (as chair)
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
--
Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication Technology
Office of the CTO Voxeo Corporation [email protected]
Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork http://www.voxeo.com
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com http://www.disruptivetelephony.com
Build voice applications based on open standards.
Find out how at http://www.voxeo.com/free
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
