Hi Bruce, >I've been in favor of adoption, and I am not going to change my opinion now.
Many thanks! >When the revision was posted, it >should have been announced on the list and the changes made to it >brought to the attention of the wg members for discussion. I announced the new revision in the p2psip mailing list on Dec 17th. >I have technical concerns with this draft that have been mentioned >before (OWD can't be measured the way this draft proposes, and I don't >believe the multiple-responses-for-an-echo-request technique should be >supported). There is an editor note in section 6.1 which indicates OWD measurement will need more discussion. Echo method has been limited to be used in some trusted overlay network where it works. >I don't understand why the "diagnostic server" material was added to >this revision. I think it should be removed. If something like this >is desired, it should be entirely separate. This section will be removed. BR Haibin >Bruce > > > > >On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, David A. Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looking for objections, since we had consensus in the room in Minneapolis. >> >> Thanks for clarifying! >> >> David (as chair) >> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Dan York <[email protected]> wrote: >>> David, >>> >>> Are you expecting us to send messages to the list agreeing with this? Or >>> are you taking the lack of *dissenting* messages as a sign of consensus? >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> P.S. I agree with this action, by the way, and did hum to adopt in the room >>> in Minneapolis. >>> >>> On Dec 26, 2008, at 10:08 AM, David A. Bryan wrote: >>> >>>> In Minneapolis, there was a hum taken which indicated rough consensus >>>> to move towards adopting the P2PSIP diagnostics draft as a working >>>> group item. Since there were also a number of corrections/changes >>>> requested, the chairs asked the authors to iterate the draft and post >>>> it, and then we would verify the consensus on list. >>>> >>>> The authors posted the revisions to the draft a few weeks ago: >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-04.txt >>>> >>>> I'd like to ask for list consensus to verify the consensus from the >>>> meeting in favor of adopting this work as a WG item. >>>> >>>> David (as chair) >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> P2PSIP mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >>> >>> -- >>> Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication Technology >>> Office of the CTO Voxeo Corporation [email protected] >>> Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork http://www.voxeo.com >>> Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com http://www.disruptivetelephony.com >>> >>> Build voice applications based on open standards. >>> Find out how at http://www.voxeo.com/free >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> P2PSIP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >> >_______________________________________________ >P2PSIP mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
