Since we've given this two weeks, and haven't seen any objections to the adoption of draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-04 as a WG item, the diagnostic draft is now a WG item.
There were obviously many technical comments and concerns, so I expect this item will be a very active one in the WG going forward. Please keep the comments and discussion going -- I'm sure the authors will appreciate the feedback. David (as chair) On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:08 AM, David A. Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > In Minneapolis, there was a hum taken which indicated rough consensus > to move towards adopting the P2PSIP diagnostics draft as a working > group item. Since there were also a number of corrections/changes > requested, the chairs asked the authors to iterate the draft and post > it, and then we would verify the consensus on list. > > The authors posted the revisions to the draft a few weeks ago: > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-04.txt > > I'd like to ask for list consensus to verify the consensus from the > meeting in favor of adopting this work as a WG item. > > David (as chair) > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
