Enrico,
Thank you for alerting us to this survey and, speaking for the
security draft author team, I'll say that it definitely sounds like
something we should consider. Thanks.
Thank you, as well, for your support of adopting the draft as a WG item.
Dan
On Sep 30, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Enrico Marocco wrote:
The P2P Research Group is publishing a survey on security issues in
p2p
overlays for realtime communications that I think this draft should in
some ways take into consideration, e.g. discussing how the various
attacks and possible solutions apply to the very specific P2PSIP case.
The survey is draft-irtf-p2prg-rtc-security; IIRC it has passed IRSG
review and is now headed to the IESG.
Sorry for not pointing this out earlier -- while this was discussed in
Stockholm I was probably in a jet lag coma on those fantastic Swedish
chairs ;-)
Anyways, I support its adoption as WG item.
Enrico
David A. Bryan wrote:
As Dan mentions below, there was a call in Stockholm to (pending the
changes requested) adopt this work as a WG item:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-overview-00.txt
As the authors feel they have made the requested changes, I'd like to
ask folks on list to confirm this consensus. Please send comments
about adoption to the list, and we'll make a call after there has
been
time to review and comment (at least a week).
Thanks,
David (as chair)
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Dan York <[email protected]> wrote:
P2PSIP working group members,
At IETF 75, we were given the direction to remove the RFC 2119
language from
the document and move it from being a normative doc to a purely
informational doc. I have now started this and made a number of
other
changes, including most notably the name change from
"p2psip-security-requirements" to "p2psip-security-overview":
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-overview-00.txt
Chairs, per the discussion that apparently happened at IETF75, we
would like
to ask for this to be considered as a working group document.
Please note... I made a mistake in the submission process and also
submitted
this as:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-requirements-06.txt
They are IDENTICAL except for the name change.
Thank you for your consideration,
Dan
--
Dan York, Director of Conversations
Voxeo Corporation http://www.voxeo.com [email protected]
Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork
Join the Voxeo conversation:
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo http://twitter.com/danyork
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
--
Dan York, Director of Conversations
Voxeo Corporation http://www.voxeo.com [email protected]
Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork
Join the Voxeo conversation:
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo http://twitter.com/danyork
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
