Seeing as we've had no objections for a week, I'll take that as list
confirmation of the room consensus Brian called in Stockholm, adopting
the security overview as a WG item.

David (as chair)

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Dan York <[email protected]> wrote:
> Enrico,
>
> Thank you for alerting us to this survey and, speaking for the security
> draft author team, I'll say that it definitely sounds like something we
> should consider.  Thanks.
>
> Thank you, as well, for your support of adopting the draft as a WG item.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Enrico Marocco wrote:
>
>> The P2P Research Group is publishing a survey on security issues in p2p
>> overlays for realtime communications that I think this draft should in
>> some ways take into consideration, e.g. discussing how the various
>> attacks and possible solutions apply to the very specific P2PSIP case.
>> The survey is draft-irtf-p2prg-rtc-security; IIRC it has passed IRSG
>> review and is now headed to the IESG.
>>
>> Sorry for not pointing this out earlier -- while this was discussed in
>> Stockholm I was probably in a jet lag coma on those fantastic Swedish
>> chairs ;-)
>>
>> Anyways, I support its adoption as WG item.
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>> David A. Bryan wrote:
>>>
>>> As Dan mentions below, there was a call in Stockholm to (pending the
>>> changes requested) adopt this work as a WG item:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-overview-00.txt
>>>
>>> As the authors feel they have made the requested changes, I'd like to
>>> ask folks on list to confirm this consensus. Please send comments
>>> about adoption to the list, and we'll make a call after there has been
>>> time to review and comment (at least a week).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> David (as chair)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Dan York <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> P2PSIP working group members,
>>>>
>>>> At IETF 75, we were given the direction to remove the RFC 2119 language
>>>> from
>>>> the document and move it from being a normative doc to a purely
>>>> informational doc.  I have now started this and made a number of other
>>>> changes, including most notably the name change from
>>>> "p2psip-security-requirements" to "p2psip-security-overview":
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-overview-00.txt
>>>>
>>>> Chairs, per the discussion that apparently happened at IETF75, we would
>>>> like
>>>> to ask for this to be considered as a working group document.
>>>>
>>>> Please note... I made a mistake in the submission process and also
>>>> submitted
>>>> this as:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-requirements-06.txt
>>>>
>>>> They are IDENTICAL except for the name change.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your consideration,
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dan York, Director of Conversations
>>>> Voxeo Corporation   http://www.voxeo.com  [email protected]
>>>> Phone: +1-407-455-5859    Skype: danyork
>>>>
>>>> Join the Voxeo conversation:
>>>> Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo  http://twitter.com/danyork
>>>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> P2PSIP mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> P2PSIP mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> P2PSIP mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
>
> --
> Dan York, Director of Conversations
> Voxeo Corporation   http://www.voxeo.com  [email protected]
> Phone: +1-407-455-5859    Skype: danyork
>
> Join the Voxeo conversation:
> Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo  http://twitter.com/danyork
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to