-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 01/17/2012 06:43 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
> We believe this revision addresses the following DISCUSS comments:
> 
> Jari Arkko Adrian Farrel Robert Sparks Peter Saint-Andre Dan Romascanu Russ
> Housley
> 
> Note: we did not address non-DISCUSS comments. We are planning to do that
> on a subsequent pass.
> 
> Most of the changes are editorial/clarifying, however, a number were
> substantive (though generally not breaking). Here's a summary of what we
> believe the major ones are:
> 
> * Changed the certificate enrollment protocol to remove the password from
> the URL. Note that this is a breaking change.
> 
> * Globally renamed "private id" and "compressed id" to "opaque id"
> 
> * Specified the details of the overlay name (S 5.3.2)
> 
> * Nailed down the fragment semantics, harmonizing between the fragment 
> field defn. and the rules for generating fragments.  The high bit must 
> always be set and unfragmented packets are represented as the last fragment
> with an offset of 0.
> 
> * Specified new requirements for malicious loop prevention:
> 
> - Configuration servers are supposed to set TTL based on overlay size. -
> Peers must check that TTL never exceeds the configured maximum. - Peers
> should check for duplicates in the destination list.
> 
> * Added a new Error_Invalid_Message generic error code.
> 
> In terms of schedule, we plan to spin a new draft before the draft deadline
> that addresses all the DISCUSS comments and as many of the comments as
> possible.
> 

I hate to be the one complaining again, but because the "final" draft will be
released around March 11th, there will be only 2 weeks to review, implement,
and try to fix it before the P2PSIP meeting itself and we all know how busy
these few weeks before a meeting are.  My prediction is that the meeting will
be simply a list of issues or fixes that people will have no time to analyze
and understand and that this meeting will be, like the one in Taipei, a waste
of time.  Won't it be more efficient to finish this now, which would give two
months to be sure that everything is OK, and declare victory in Paris?

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: [email protected]
Professional email: [email protected]
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=u8Fs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to