Cullen, Back in September and October of last year, I posted 6 questions and suggested corrections to base-19, but all of them went on unanswered. I also don't see them being addressed by base-20. These are their subject lines:
[P2PSIP] Base draft section 6.4.3.2 Stat Response Definition clarification, Michael Chen [P2PSIP] Question about base draft section 9.7.4.2, Michael Chen [P2PSIP] Base section 10.4 clarification, Michael Chen [P2PSIP] Base draft 9.5 bullet 2 needs to be revised, Michael Chen [P2PSIP] Question about base draft 9.7.4.4 Detecting partitioning, Michael Chen [P2PSIP] Base draft 9.7.4.1 title does not match its content, Michael Chen Would any of the key members revisit and reply them? Thanks --Michael > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [P2PSIP] Update of reload base draft > From: Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, January 17, 2012 6:43 pm > To: P2PSIP Mailing List <[email protected]> > > > We believe this revision addresses the following DISCUSS comments: > > Jari Arkko > Adrian Farrel > Robert Sparks > Peter Saint-Andre > Dan Romascanu > Russ Housley > > Note: we did not address non-DISCUSS comments. We are planning to > do that on a subsequent pass. > > Most of the changes are editorial/clarifying, however, a number > were substantive (though generally not breaking). Here's a summary > of what we believe the major ones are: > > * Changed the certificate enrollment protocol to remove the > password from the URL. Note that this is a breaking change. > > * Globally renamed "private id" and "compressed id" to "opaque id" > > * Specified the details of the overlay name (S 5.3.2) > > * Nailed down the fragment semantics, harmonizing between the fragment > field defn. and the rules for generating fragments. The high bit must > always be set and unfragmented packets are represented as the last > fragment with an offset of 0. > > * Specified new requirements for malicious loop prevention: > > - Configuration servers are supposed to set TTL based on > overlay size. > - Peers must check that TTL never exceeds the configured > maximum. > - Peers should check for duplicates in the destination > list. > > * Added a new Error_Invalid_Message generic error code. > > In terms of schedule, we plan to spin a new draft before the draft > deadline that addresses all the DISCUSS comments and as many > of the comments as possible. > > Ekr, Bruce, & Cullen > > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
