-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

frank muriuki wrote:
> Hi Guyz,
> 
> Thank you for the corrections.Now using snmpwalk command after the 
> corrections you highlighted there seems to be communication between
> the switch and the linux server. There are also logs been generated
> under snmpd trap, however i still have a challenge with Packetfence 
> communicating with the switch when it comes to switching vlans i.e.
> from mac-detection vlan to registration vlan to normal vlan.
> 
> How can i verify that Packetfence is actually communicating with the
> switch.

You can try using SNMP debugging on the switch, or just look at the
packetfence logs.  If packetfence is unable to communicate, it puts a
message in the logs to that effect.

> Regards, Frank

- -- 
- ---------------------------
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[email protected]
- ---------------------------

"Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology."
- - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlHYt08ACgkQ8CjzPZyTUTQrHQCfb+XgbTHI188vSqq4WG/6b4o3
AJUAoIou+BHTbcY6KraXThWkIqnKo5v3
=zPJM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to