At 08:12 PM 3/31/99 -0500, you wrote: >On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, DaveM wrote: > >Remember that Scott said that an empty ZIP field would take the SQL server >down. Given that assumption, I think this does seem a valid case for a >forcing function: a technological limitation exists, so the human factors >must take it into consideration, and make the limitation palpable (to >perhaps use a poor term) by the user. > Excuse me? Whats wrong with the conduit doing some data validation? After all, the PC is supposed to have more processing power. Hell, whats wrong with only marking records "dirty" if they are valid in the first place? Or having a "valid record" category? You people are all making a mountain out of a molehill.
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Alan Johnson
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Jason Dawes
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Michael Ethetton
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Mike Pellegrino
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Alan Johnson
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Bob Ebert
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Alan Johnson
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Kenneth Albanowski
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation DaveM
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Kenneth Albanowski
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Jason Dawes
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Bob Ebert
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Hal DeVore
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Chris Antos
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Hal DeVore
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Mark Beckman
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Larry W. Virden
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Richard Hartman
- RE: Strategy for navigation & validation Richard Hartman
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Scott Johnson
- Re: Strategy for navigation & validation Bob Ebert
