Aaron Ardiri wrote: > > the regcode code is encrypted.. > > they need to patch the "program", otherwise work damn hard to > get the regcode algorithm out. Eh? Of course they patch the "program"; that's what patches *do*. I must still be missing something. If you mean that they must patch the encrypted part of the program, I claim that's not true. They just have to patch the code that gets executed PRIOR to entering the "decrypt, execute" part of the code and branch around it. --Mark
- No code is crack proof! Mike Davis
- Re: No code is crack proof! Jean Cyr
- Re: No code is crack proof! Jean Cyr
- Re: No code is crack proof! Aaron Ardiri
- Re: No code is crack proof! Mike Davis
- Re: No code is crack proof! Mark Nudelman
- RE: No code is crack proof! Eric Davis
- Re: No code is crack proof! Jean Cyr
- Re: No code is crack proof! Aaron Ardiri
- Re: No code is crack proof! Jason Dawes
- Re: No code is crack proof! Mark Nudelman
- Re: No code is crack proof! Mark Nudelman
- Re: No code is crack proof! Jason Dawes
- Re: No code is crack proof! Aaron Ardiri
- Re: No code is crack proof! Aaron Ardiri
- Re: No code is crack proof! Mark Nudelman
- Re: No code is crack proof! ArminXOXOX
