Jon, > Jon Baer wrote: > ... and meanwhile they push developers to using > the 3.5 SDK which would make it a little obsolete(im guessing) when > these new Palms come around. The Palm OS 3.5 includes types such as Int32, Int16, etc. I recall that a Palm representative stated that these types are now being used to make the code less dependent on the processor (i.e. more portable). I'm guessing that a processor change has been in the plans for a while and I believe that Palm is doing the best that they can to make it so that all we have to do is recompile our code. I realize that there will be bumps in the road but never-the-less I see that Palm will at least try to give us a paved road. Mike McCollister -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palm.com/devzone/mailinglists.html
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Steve Sabram
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Haemish Graham
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Peter Hribar
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Steve Sabram
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Peter Hribar
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Dave Lippincott
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Haemish Graham
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Tim Astle
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Chris Faherty
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Jon Baer
- RE: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? McCollister, Mike
- RE: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Chris Faherty
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Michael S. Davis
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Tom Zerucha
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Tom Zerucha
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Michael Sokolov
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? B. Flaumenhaft
- RE: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Nick Rossi
- Re: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Jon Baer
- RE: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? David Fedor
- RE: End Of Dragonball? Palm Shakeup? Fitzpatrick, Joe
