-----Original Message----- From: Max Bian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2002 3:37 AM To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) > Do we need a new puild-prc and new pilrc? We probably do. AFAIK, ARM GCC compiler provides ELF support (a Linux-like), while m68k-palmos-gcc can only create COFF. ELF format is much better, but it definitely needs changes in build-prc. Michael -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Keith Rollin
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Ben Combee
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) John Marshall
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Aaron Ardiri
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) John Marshall
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Shaikh Khurram Saghir
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Max Bian
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Max Bian
- Re: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Aaron Ardiri
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Gavin Maxwell
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Keith Rollin
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Keith Rollin
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Max Bian
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Keith Rollin
- RE: Palm and ARM (Was: PL/I for Palm ?) Michael Glickman
