On Tuesday 30 December 2008 22:52:30 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:59:21 +0000 > > Robert Piasek <[email protected]> wrote: > > so 0m0.061s vs ~3.5min? > > 3.5min means you don't have pre-generated cache. Since you're running > the command several times, you're probably missing write_cache for some > repositories.
Spot on. I had a missing write_cache for one of the repositories. Now it looks more reasonably: real 0m9.444s (a small note here. Since this option makes _huge_ difference, would it be worth adding few words to http://paludis.pioto.org/configuration/repositories.html? It seems it's mentioned only briefly in getting started and doesn't really reflect the impact it has on search times). At the end of the day, we still have massive difference anyway. It's really dependent on use case scenario. For some actions eix is better for others inquisitio wins. Would you consider adding checked/approved version of eix-update hook to http://git.pioto.org/gitweb/paludis-scripts.git?a=tree? Thanks Ciaran! Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
