I've just read through the thread about Canon's newly- released car models, and the subsequent discussion of various ways of working around their site design to get to the model files. And I was struck (again) by just how *wrong* the situation is when one has to go to these lengths to avoid something that was intended (I presume!!) to make it easier in some way to access the files. Or it was intended to 'improve the user experience' in some way. Or something.
So I'm asking, does anyone actually find this stuff useful, or find that it makes the site that much more aesthetically pleasing, or improves your experience with a site significantly in some way? And, if so, in what way? Alternately, if you have ever designed a site that was loaded with Javascript and/or Flash, etc., why did you do it that way, as opposed to some kind of more basic HTML arrangement? Incidentally, I do mean this as a serious question, not a rhetorical whine; I'm genuinely curious about this. :) Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Papermodels II" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Papermodels?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
