Generally, I like a basic, easy to use download link, that doesn't require me to open the file before saving it.
Paul M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael G. Henders" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:51 PM Subject: [Papermodels II 37173] Semi-OT: Website complications -- why?!? > > I've just read through the thread about Canon's newly- > released car models, and the subsequent discussion of > various ways of working around their site design to > get to the model files. And I was struck (again) by > just how *wrong* the situation is when one has to go > to these lengths to avoid something that was intended > (I presume!!) to make it easier in some way to access > the files. Or it was intended to 'improve the user > experience' in some way. Or something. > > So I'm asking, does anyone actually find this stuff > useful, or find that it makes the site that much more > aesthetically pleasing, or improves your experience > with a site significantly in some way? And, if so, > in what way? Alternately, if you have ever designed > a site that was loaded with Javascript and/or Flash, > etc., why did you do it that way, as opposed to some > kind of more basic HTML arrangement? > > Incidentally, I do mean this as a serious question, > not a rhetorical whine; I'm genuinely curious about > this. :) > > Mike > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Papermodels II" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Papermodels?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
